Welcome Guest

I started examining the evidence against the Clintons

Posted on: November 23, 2019 at 14:12:19 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.92 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
in the early 90s. I have no doubt she personally committed federal crimes which are felonies.

I have no doubt she had ties which allowed for the destruction of evidence which could have been used to convict her.

It was illegal to keep top secret information on her personal server. No rational person questions the fact she did, gave others access to it. I am convinced by the reports that she committed a federal offense of lying to the F.B.I. The only other plausible explanation is that her mind was so far gone at the time, that she was mentally unfit, seeing she couldn't remember signing a document verifying her training on the care of top secret information. I could go into more detail, but I won't.


"... Yet, when the FBI questioned Secretary Clinton about these matters, she repeatedly told the FBI that she is, frankly, clueless about secret information. She told the FBI agents that she could not name a single example of how a document becomes classified. She also told the FBI agents she could not remember ever receiving training on how to handle classified material even though she personally signed a form acknowledging her training. She could not remember when she received her security clearance, or what that meant. She knew that she also gave some aides access to her unsecured and unauthorized email accounts but could not remember who had such access. ..."

https://verdict.justia.com/2017/02/20/protecting-top-secret-information-secretary-state-rest-government


" ... "Let me repeat what I have repeated for many months now," Clinton said July 2, 2016. "I never received nor sent any material that was marked classified."

In reality, Clinton has made the same general claim two ways. At a Democratic debate in February, Clinton said, "I never sent or received any classified material." Other times she’s added the qualifier that she never sent material "marked" classified.

We previously found that Clinton was spinning what was publicly known about the FBI investigation and Clinton’s emails. We rated her claim Half True. (See an archived version of that fact-check.)

Now we know it’s just plain wrong. ..."


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/06/hillary-clinton/fbi-findings-tear-holes-hillary-clintons-email-def/
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Giuliani Letter to Graham - kp83 MU - 11/23 11:15:08
     If crooked Rudy has anything to say, he should appear - tigerdb MU - 11/23 11:31:14
          If Rudy is crooked, what is (are) his crime(s), what - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/23 13:08:35
               I'm assuming, that as a Loyal American Patriot, you are in - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/23 13:20:23
                    Was that your position when "lock her up" was a campaign - tigerdb MU - 11/23 13:23:36
                         it's a proven fact she committed a crime as did many of - blake1771 MU - 11/24 00:53:12
                         Oh whatabout - Wildcat KSU - 11/23 16:52:34
                         I started examining the evidence against the Clintons - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/23 14:12:19
                         so non-partisan. lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/23 13:59:42
                              I don't recall anyone ever asserting that you are non- - tigerdb MU - 11/23 14:10:56
                                   why do you post using children's words? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/23 14:18:10
               Campaign finance laws, bribery and failure to register as a - tigerdb MU - 11/23 13:17:14
                    Perhaps you didn't fully comprehend what I said. - MizzouTigerz MU - 11/23 14:37:21
          What exactly would you expect from the President's personal - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/23 11:53:56
               He'd be smart to plead the 5th.... - tigerdb MU - 11/23 11:58:24
                    No reason to(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 11/23 12:45:28
                    RE: He'd be smart to plead the 5th: Why? What crime has - BH O'bonga MU - 11/23 12:05:20
                         Rudy is the subject of a criminal investigation - he - tigerdb MU - 11/23 12:08:08
                              RE: Rudy is subject of criminal investigation: Can you cite - BH O'bonga MU - 11/23 13:18:32
                              Hell, President Trump was the subject... - kp83 MU - 11/23 12:29:40
                    That would be unique. - kp83 MU - 11/23 12:03:01
                         he's a partisan; his only view is D winning. There's not - 90Tiger STL - 11/23 12:05:15
                              Good one teets(nm) - tigerdb MU - 11/23 12:09:08
                                   why do you post using children's words? (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/23 13:02:32
                                        I give you the level of respect that you deserve. - tigerdb MU - 11/23 13:12:38
                                             lol, glad to see you using your adult words (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/23 13:16:30
                    Why would he plead the 5th? Everything he has discussed with - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/23 12:02:10
                         Most likely not - tigerdb MU - 11/23 12:06:15
                              Cites Lawfare - kp83 MU - 11/23 12:20:10
                                   What source would you prefer? - tigerdb MU - 11/23 12:28:01
                                        Interesting that you read the stuff the seditionists... - kp83 MU - 11/23 12:34:07
                                             Good comeback.....do you or the other trumptard have a - tigerdb MU - 11/23 12:40:18
          If the Dems were interested in the truth... - kp83 MU - 11/23 11:35:21
     This is not an expose' of the Democrats... - kp83 MU - 11/23 11:25:06
          true dat (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 11/23 11:29:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard