Three Impeachment Show Trial Observations

Posted on: November 23, 2019 at 10:39:13 CT

1. If the Resistance had a legitimate case on the quid pro quo (no I mean bribery, no its abuse of power...), they would not have had to rig the rules of the hearing in such partisan fashion so as to exclude witnesses for the defense and exhibit such total reliance on hearsay which would be inadmissible in any actual court proceeding.

2. Has there ever been a sleazier congressional proceeding than the show trial's tactic of orchestrated testimony to produce sound bites for dissemination to the mockingbird mainstream media before they would get thoroughly exposed as narrative engineering upon cross (e.g. Sondman's presumption based on nothing he heard anyone say, presented as fact)?

3. Another sign of desperation - it is hard to believe there could have been a cast of characters that would elicit less sympathy from the public than the witnesses assembled for latest edition of the hoax. What a bunch of pompous asses. Clear evidence that draining the swamp is a praiseworthy objective.

Please add to this list your take-aways.

Edited by kp83 at 10:48:06 on 11/23/19