Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

lol so there will only be 2 weeks of public hearings?

Posted on: November 11, 2019 at 11:14:05 CT
Ragnar Danneskjold MU
Posts:
81634
Member For:
20.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
There isn't anybody this week that can testify about anything substantive.

Who do they bring in next week?

Also does this mean there won't be any muh rushin collusion in the articles?

And about the time this is sent to the Senate to be dismissed, the Durham report should come out.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

lol so there will only be 2 weeks of public hearings? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/11 11:14:05
     How many weeks would be sufficient?(nm) - playhard NWMSU - 11/11 13:34:07
     Thry are looking for an exit ramp(nm) - tman MU - 11/11 11:51:22
          This is THE very difficulty I mentioned the other day - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 12:21:03
               " no media I have heard" - dangertim MU - 11/11 13:32:13
                    Golly, do I not watch Fox or listen to Rush enough ? (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 13:46:00
                         strike two(nm) - dangertim MU - 11/11 13:56:28
                              That was high and inside(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 14:21:44
               Support for the impeachment has dropped to 30% - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/11 12:38:06
                    No. It hasn't. (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/11 13:09:21
                         Rask doesn't know anyone against it. nm. - MUTGR MU - 11/11 13:09:48
     Whole thing has descended into clown college - mu7176grad MU - 11/11 11:27:19
          WB can't testify, because the Pubs would force him to claim - None**** MU - 11/11 11:48:40
          No other possible outcome, it's being run by clowns. - RHAYWORTH MU - 11/11 11:41:18
               that's not the real reason he won't be testifying - ashtray UF - 11/11 12:00:24
                    Oddly, you failed to mention the real reason. - RHAYWORTH MU - 11/11 12:03:21
                    lol what's the real reason?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/11 12:02:56
     One call, we all have seen the transcript, and it was - MUTGR MU - 11/11 11:26:42
          it wasn't a transcript - ashtray UF - 11/11 12:00:54
          Not perfect but not impeachable - mu7176grad MU - 11/11 11:28:50
               RE: Not perfect but not impeachable - Ace AU - 11/11 11:40:19
               Choose your words. Not a damn thing wrong with that - MUTGR MU - 11/11 11:39:59




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard