"Hochstein, who accompanied Biden in nearly every meeting he had with then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, was a vocal proponent of Ukraine cracking down on Burisma Holdings. The source familiar with the meeting believes that Blue Star Strategies intended to convince Hochstein (but did not) that Burisma was on the level and did not warrant further investigation.
In a lengthy feature piece about the vice president's son from July 2019, the New Yorker reported that Hochstein "raised the matter" of Hunter Biden's role on the Burisma board to Joe Biden. However, Hochstein has publicly maintained that he never heard the elder Biden bring up Burisma or his son in meetings with Poroshenko."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/joe-biden-adviser-amos-hochstein-took-meetings-with-burisma-hired-blue-star-strategies
If Biden was SOO disappointed in the anit-corruption prosecuter Ukraine had and his handling of Burisma, why didn't he bring his concerns to the president of Ukraine?
Wonder why congress didn't subpoena Amos Hochstein, he was in early meetings with Zelensky regarding Giuliani's position on investigations
As an American citizen, Hochstein is the only person from the meeting in the AP piece whom Congress has the undisputed authority to subpoena. Not only could he testify to the question of impropriety with regards to the Bidens and Burisma, but he could also provide key details about the Zelensky meeting. Even more importantly, he could explain the events that precipitated it and instigated Zelensky's fears.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/subpoena-amos-hochstein-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-burisma-holdings-and-trumps-quid-pro-quoEdited by tigerinhogtown at 10:43:30 on 11/08/19