Welcome Guest

Not what you said. Your post was about people ignoring

Posted on: November 7, 2019 at 13:38:47 CT

Spanky KU

Posts:

146380

Member For:

21.01 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

subpoenas and your comment about Bolton was that he not currently an Executive Branch employee and that obstruction does not fit.... you said nothing about the fact that Bolton was not subpoenaed

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

The calculus is complex - Ace AU - 11/7 11:40:44

That's weak of the Dems. - raskolnikov MU - 11/7 12:02:12

No obstruction - Spanky KU - 11/7 12:08:26

That was altered from his initial offer though the idea that - raskolnikov MU - 11/7 12:28:58

Guess which branch is responsible for enforcing those - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/7 13:41:43

That was entirely different. Obama was Rask's Messiah - Spanky KU - 11/7 14:13:03

Nor was Bolton subpoenaed. - Spanky KU - 11/7 12:52:28

What I said(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/7 13:09:23

Not what you said. Your post was about people ignoring - Spanky KU - 11/7 13:38:47

Are you unfamiliar with the concept that Congress is not - Spanky KU - 11/7 12:43:44

That has plent of limits friend(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/7 13:10:29

I listed the limits. What do you think I missed? - Spanky KU - 11/7 13:31:25

Bolton doesn't work for trump(nm) - dangertim MU

- 11/7 11:51:24

Schiff fears the courts - Spanky KU - 11/7 11:45:37

Now that is telling - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 11/7 11:51:25

12(nm) - tman MU - 11/7 11:44:17