 |
|
FBI admits (or concocts) mind-boggling mistake in Flynn
Posted on: November 6, 2019 at 08:03:07 CT
None**** MU
Posts:
4919
Member For:
7.29 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
interview notes.
"Sidney Powell, Gen. Michael Flynn’s replacement lawyer, is pulling on a thread that is unraveling the conspiracy to generate a crime with which to bludgeon him into cooperating in incriminating President Trump in the Russia hoax."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/fbi_admits_or_concocts_mindboggling_mistake_on_notes_taken_on_general_flynn_interview_that_resulted_in_guilty_plea.html
During my long gov't career I routinely interviewed both subjects and witnesses and had perfected my note taking and report writing skills to a high degree. Reviewing the notes released by the prosecution, it is clear which set of handwritten notes was generated during the Flynn interview. The other set, now ascribed to Agent Pietka are essentially a rough draft narrative report. They are not contemporaneous interview notes, as the Mueller Team residual prosecutor Van Grack now claims. The big question is why would a professional investigator take the time to compose and write out by hand an investigation report narrative? He has access to a laptop computer, as well as a desktop back at the office. The best reason I can come up with is that the Agent didn't want to leave an electronic fingerprint dating and signing the revised notes. No one writes out a rough draft IRN by hand, not even an FBI Agent.
Edited by None**** at 08:03:39 on 11/06/19
"Sidney Powell, Gen. Michael Flynn’s replacement lawyer, is pulling on a thread that is unraveling the conspiracy to generate a crime with which to bludgeon him into cooperating in incriminating President Trump in the Russia hoax."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/fbi_admits_or_concocts_mindboggling_mistake_on_notes_taken_on_general_flynn_interview_that_resulted_in_guilty_plea.html
During my long gov't career I routinely interviewed both subjects and witnesses and had perfected my note taking and report writing skills to a high degree. Reviewing the notes released by the prosecution, it is clear which set of handwritten notes was generated during the Flynn interview. The other set, now ascribed to Agent Pietka are essentially a rough draft narrative report. They are not contemporaneous interview notes, as the Mueller Team residual prosecutor Van Grack now claims. The big question is why would a professional investigator take the time to compose and write out by hand an investigation report narrative? He has access to a laptop computer, as well as a desktop back at the office. The best reason I can come up with is that the Agent didn't want to leave an electronic fingerprint dating and signing the revised notes. No one writes out a rough draft IRN by hand, not even an FBI Agent.
Edited by None**** at 08:03:39 on 11/06/19
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
FBI admits (or concocts) mind-boggling mistake in Flynn - None**** MU - 11/6 08:03:07
-