Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

As I have said before, if the Dems push through impeachment

Posted on: November 5, 2019 at 16:23:12 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51161
Member For:
16.88 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
with no input from the GOP and just along party lines then I think that the Senate should call an immediate vote.

The other option that would be just as amusing would be to call Schiff and his staff and find just how much input they had with the WB and their string of witnesses. How much of their testimony was coached by the Dems in their impeachment frenzy?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Unprofessional - Ace AU - 11/5 16:13:23
     it's because there are no "DAMNING" transcripts(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 11/5 17:43:04
     As I have said before, if the Dems push through impeachment - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:23:12
          what do you mean by "no input from the GOP"? - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:25:40
               Maybe call witnesses. Allowed the same access to the - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:28:47
                    they were allowed all that - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:30:12
                         BS. The committee chairs are deciding which witnesses are - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:39:18
                              that was the dog and pony show the Rs were making - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:42:04
                                   I don’t get my news from FB, that is for idiots like you. - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:53:53
     the evidence wouldn't change his mind... - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:21:10
          actually I've read the testimony and his "update" - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:23:42
     Intelligent people agree with senator graham(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 11/5 16:20:57
     At least he's going into this with an open mind(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 11/5 16:15:06
     So he's going with the fingers in the ears yelling "La la la - StaleyTiger MU - 11/5 16:14:09
          no idiot he's written it off because it is a sham(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:14:30
               No, he's written it off because he's already said that if - StaleyTiger MU - 11/5 16:20:30
                    Which word of the ambassador? His word while testifying or - DHighlander NWMSU - 11/5 16:26:34
                    Uh the ambassador said it was his impression that Ukraine - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:22:44
                         you would only know that if you read the transcript - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:23:34
                              ok?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:24:04
                                   RE: ok?(nm) - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:26:39
                                        Well I read them and he's right - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:27:21
                                             he wouldn't know that - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:29:04
                                                  He is making an educated guess - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:30:07
                                                       or a partisan one (nm) - ashtray UF - 11/5 16:32:22
               Nah. He's written it off because he's a sham(nm) - Danny Whizzbang USA - 11/5 16:15:48
     lol awesome(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 11/5 16:14:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard