Welcome Guest

Absolutely not

Posted on: November 5, 2019 at 08:06:59 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
126865
Member For:
22.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He was attempting to tag onto a stupid, unconstitutional previous ruling in CA. The inconsistency of the courts is staggering. But so is how misunderstood freedom of speech is among Americans.

Edited by 4TigersinMichigan at 08:07:36 on 11/05/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The same PragerU idiot - El-ahrairah BAMA - 11/5 07:53:30
     Prager is horrible - pickle MU - 11/5 07:58:39
     The comment about his kids was stupid - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/5 07:57:56
          Does free speech apply to private property like Youtube? - El-ahrairah BAMA - 11/5 07:59:57
               Absolutely not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/5 08:06:59
                    Seems like a moral person who knew rights wouldn’t do that(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 11/5 08:14:50
                         Well, I’m not so sure - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/5 08:16:56
                              an understanding of rights would inform a moral code - pickle MU - 11/5 08:21:22
                         it’s ok. the taxpayers will foot the bill (nm) - pickle MU - 11/5 08:15:57
                    Inconsistency in the courts or with a “constitutionalist”? - pickle MU - 11/5 08:08:29
               that’s his ceiling (nm) - pickle MU - 11/5 08:00:56




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard