Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

He said portions were omitted (nm)

Posted on: October 30, 2019 at 12:45:02 CT
MrBlueSky MU
Posts:
48578
Member For:
20.51 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Much like Nixon’s doctored tapes, Trump released a doctored - Ace AU - 10/30 12:43:27
     Vindman didn't say that anything was doctored - Spanky KU - 10/30 12:44:45
          Your are arguing with idiots - mu7176grad MU - 10/30 12:49:39
          He attempted to correct the record - Ace AU - 10/30 12:47:10
               He attempted to edit(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:52:49
               What did he say was omitted that changed the accuracy - Spanky KU - 10/30 12:50:44
                    RE: What did he say was omitted that changed the accuracy - Ace AU - 10/30 12:53:06
                         lol. No(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:59:37
                         And that changes things how - tman MU - 10/30 12:56:45
                              stay tuned... - ashtray UF - 10/30 13:06:42
                         Show me what he specifically said that contradicted his - Spanky KU - 10/30 12:54:00
          He said portions were omitted (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/30 12:45:02
               He either thinks the transcript in public is accurate - Sal MU - 10/30 12:58:30
               He didn't say PERTINENT portions were omitted that - Spanky KU - 10/30 12:49:40
                    because he should phrase things exactly like Spanky - ashtray UF - 10/30 12:50:34
                         What did he say were key elements that were omitted - Spanky KU - 10/30 12:51:32
                              from the reaction of Pubs today? - ashtray UF - 10/30 13:07:37
                                   So you don't know? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/30 13:08:14
                                        not yet - ashtray UF - 10/30 13:09:31
               so, you're saying it could have been more than - dangertim MU - 10/30 12:47:11
                    Your logic is fantasmic.(nm) - Toger STL - 10/30 12:50:06
                    He said specifically - MrBlueSky MU - 10/30 12:49:54
                         lol but didn't provide those parts? (nm) - Sal MU - 10/30 12:57:28
                              He may have. His testimony has not been released (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/30 13:09:59
                                   well, not all of it at least ... just certain parts - Sal MU - 10/30 13:16:43
                         Show me what he specifically said that contradicted his - Spanky KU - 10/30 12:53:32
                         Yeah! Because he said so!!!(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:51:45
                         ooohhhhh....juicy!(nm) - dangertim MU - 10/30 12:50:27
                              So I guess the we don't know what was said on the call - Sal MU - 10/30 12:59:53
                                   we know most of it - ashtray UF - 10/30 13:09:00
                                        According to Vindman, what's in the public - Sal MU - 10/30 13:17:37
                                             no he isn't - ashtray UF - 10/30 13:18:59
                                                  Yes he is - Sal MU - 10/30 13:20:12
                                                       knowing some of it - ashtray UF - 10/30 13:28:08
               lol. Vindman tried to edit to support his lie(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:45:52
     an exact transcript(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:44:06
          You mean the memo thst said it isn’t a verbatim transcript? - Ace AU - 10/30 12:45:28
               An exact transcript Nick(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:46:21
                    Which doesn't exist and isn't standard protocol(nm) - tman MU - 10/30 12:48:02
                         Wut?(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 10/30 12:49:17
                              Study what the process is for calls such as this(nm) - tman MU - 10/30 12:57:51




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard