Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Taylors testimony conflicts with the text exchange with

Posted on: October 22, 2019 at 13:32:04 CT

blake1771 MU

Posts:

14357

Member For:

19.88 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

Sondland. so no matter what Taylor perceived he was wrong as shown here.

to quote:

Taylor: As I said on the phone I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign

Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump's intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms President Zelensky promised during his campaign. I suggest we stop the back and forth by text if you still have concerns I recommend you give Lisa S or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump is F’d - Ace AU - 10/22 11:50:15

can't wait for 2 lines from that 15 pages to get - dangertim MU

- 10/22 11:53:59

Are you familiar with the concept of due process? - MizzouTigerz MU

- 10/22 11:53:33

Taylors testimony conflicts with the text exchange with - blake1771 KC - 10/22 13:32:04

Sondland texted that after talking to Trump - mgtiger MU - 10/22 14:44:41

That would apply if it's ever voted to the Senate (nm) - Sal MU

- 10/22 12:22:16

The defense part of impeachment - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:07:53

due process isn’t relevant here - pickle MU

- 10/22 12:02:36

Very relevant for the people being brought in front of the - tman MU - 10/22 12:07:29

Is that your argument for why Due Process applies? - Ace AU - 10/22 12:13:10

You legal training and experience leaves alot - tman MU - 10/22 12:21:15

LOL - Ace AU - 10/22 12:25:25

do you understand the impeachment process? - mgtiger MU - 10/22 11:58:40

You dont understand it. That much is clear(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:00:12

its been awhile, no answer - mgtiger MU - 10/22 14:46:01

RE: You dont understand it. That much is clear(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:08:38

here, this explains it for you - mgtiger MU - 10/22 12:05:12

explain - mgtiger MU - 10/22 12:03:14

You have been posting on here regarding it and items - tman MU - 10/22 12:05:07

RE: You have been posting on here regarding it and items - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 12:31:59

Facts of which you know nothing about(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:44:56

there you go - mgtiger MU - 10/22 12:05:37

Tell me how or why it applies here. I have already seen - Ace AU - 10/22 11:55:33

Well given you think it is like a grand jury, do you think - tman MU - 10/22 11:57:00

witnesses? Or Donnie Large Bottom? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 12:00:43

Is it just like a gand jury(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:01:33

just like? No. Similarities? Certainly (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 12:20:41

Not even close to the same(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:21:58

RE: Not even close to the same(nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 12:30:25

That is really your strongest argument?(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:47:22

It is markedly stronger than yours - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 10/22 13:05:33

you confuse me with someone else - Ace AU - 10/22 12:00:02

I got under your skin. Did I hurt your feelings(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:00:50

Oh, I am wound up! - Ace AU - 10/22 12:04:45

Haha. TDS(nm) - tman MU - 10/22 12:05:52

lol BOMBSHELL!! - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 10/22 11:52:48

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard