Welcome Guest

It went from testimony behind closed doors, to testimony

Posted on: October 14, 2019 at 11:11:58 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

229171

Member For:

21.98 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

with the identity of WB protected, to not needing a testimony at all. Schiff's position changes each time more is released about the WB. I'm also guessing he didn't want the GOP to ask the WB any questions.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Whistleblower testimony not needed as we have transcript - mu7176grad MU - 10/14 11:07:30

RE: Whistleblower testimony not needed as we have transcript - MOCO SON MU - 10/14 11:20:23

RE: Whistleblower testimony not needed as we have transcript - None**** MU - 10/14 11:15:51

My guess: Like Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford, the WB - hokie VT - 10/14 11:15:12

RE: My guess: Like Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford, the WB - MOCO SON MU - 10/14 11:23:43

You’re an attorney, smarten up - Ace AU - 10/14 11:15:08

It went from testimony behind closed doors, to testimony - Sal MU

- 10/14 11:11:58

RE: It went from testimony behind closed doors, to testimony - MOCO SON MU - 10/14 11:26:03

RE: It went from testimony behind closed doors, to testimony - MOCO SON MU - 10/14 11:32:46