Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Absolutely not true

Posted on: October 11, 2019 at 13:29:20 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56694
Member For:
18.71 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
If you're charged with overseeing what he claims are his investments, but he doesn't disclose one, looking at his earlier tax returns may cause of disclosure of the investment. Does it mean he's intentionally done anything wrong? No, it could have been a mere oversight. Or, maybe he divested. However, to say there's no legitimate purpose is just you being a partisan.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

yeah SCOTUS will likely overturn this one - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/11 11:12:07
     it would require making new law - gmmm98 MU - 10/11 11:37:14
          My thinking is that the SC denies cert - Ace AU - 10/11 11:40:17
               seems likely - gmmm98 MU - 10/11 11:45:49
          lol wut?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/11 11:37:59
               there is no precedent for trump's position/the dissent - gmmm98 MU - 10/11 11:45:26
                    Are you retarded? The opinion is based on - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/11 11:49:24
                         it is not an issue of first impression. - gmmm98 MU - 10/11 11:55:44
                              That is absolutely false - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/11 12:19:04
                                   keep shouting at the clouds, old man - gmmm98 MU - 10/11 12:24:54
     Yep.... - Spanky KU - 10/11 11:31:45
          So Congress' only oversight authority over the executive - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/11 11:46:10
               There is no OVERSIGHT reason to see any Trump - Spanky KU - 10/11 13:12:42
                    Absolutely not true - Mormad MU - 10/11 13:29:20
               nope. But keep flaming(nm) - tman MU - 10/11 12:01:07




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard