Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

no it didn't. let's go through it shall we?

Posted on: October 9, 2019 at 09:19:48 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14451
Member For:
20.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
1. does not meet the legal definition of an urgent concern
2. posed risk to national security? this is a lie.
3. encouraged foreign interference in the US election? this is a lie
4. after pleasantries DJT used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests? this is a lie
5. pressured Zelensky to help his reelection bid. this is supposition but certainly not expressed in the call
6. POTUS praised Lutsenko and suggested keeping him in his job. this is a lie
7. Ulrich Brechbuh was on the call. this is a lie
8. senior WH officials attempted to lock down the call transcript. this is a lie
9. staffers were told to remove the electronic transcript from where they are normally stored. thisis a lie
10. characterization of Volker and Sondland's meeting with Ukrainian representatives. lie

i could go on, but you get the point.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

You know what is interesting, WB attacks have stepped up - Ace AU - 10/9 08:48:22
     Transcript is smoking gun. Attack on WB a smokescreen(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 10:09:08
     The IG wasn't even aware the WB went to Schiff first - Sal MU - 10/9 08:51:08
          Panic set in at the WH - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 08:55:08
               How did they cover it up when they released - Sal MU - 10/9 08:55:37
                    12 minutes of transcript - MrBlueSky MU - 10/9 09:15:50
                         standard protocol for recording phone calls - Sal MU - 10/9 09:18:41
                              Sal-how di you know so much detail on calls with foreign - Ace AU - 10/9 09:23:02
                    The memcon itself states it is not a verbatim transcript of - Mo Texan MU - 10/9 09:14:46
                         There is no transcript you putz! There has not been since - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/9 09:32:53
                              As stated earlier - Mo Texan MU - 10/9 09:50:14
                         What is the buffoon hiding? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 09:21:02
                              Nothing. You probably think there is a recording of the - Sal MU - 10/9 09:25:52
                                   No, but I know there is a more complete - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 09:33:40
                                        You think there is an exact word for word transcipt - Sal MU - 10/9 09:34:56
                                             I don't know - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 09:43:11
                         There is no other document - Sal MU - 10/9 09:17:23
                              And a release of the actual voice-recognition transcript - Mo Texan MU - 10/9 09:31:12
                                   "voice recognition transcript" - Sal MU - 10/9 09:35:26
                                        The calls are recorded - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 09:47:33
                                             Are you referring to an audio recording - Sal MU - 10/9 09:55:56
                                                  I've never said anything about an audio recording, Einsal... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 10:01:09
                                        So the WH is wrong? - Mo Texan MU - 10/9 09:39:10
                                             I thought you meant an actual recording (nm) - Sal MU - 10/9 09:54:33
                                             Einsal is an absolute clueless derp - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 09:48:27
                                                  Those VR notes would be part of the transcripts - Sal MU - 10/9 09:58:19
                                                       So releasing them shouldn't be a problem.(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 10/9 10:11:23
                    RE: How did they cover it up: Don't feed the trolls. - None**** MU - 10/9 09:05:50
                    You mean the partial memo of the call, Einsal? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/9 09:02:29
                         RE: You mean the partial memo of the call, Einsal? - Sal MU - 10/9 09:13:16
          Irrelevant - Ace AU - 10/9 08:53:25
               no it didn't. let's go through it shall we? - blake1771 KC - 10/9 09:19:48
               no, it obviously wasn't (nm) - Sal MU - 10/9 08:55:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard