Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Damned you are stupid. 49% is not even a majority.

Posted on: October 9, 2019 at 08:48:37 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
47880
Member For:
16.13 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It takes a supermajority to remove from office and the Dems do not even have a majority in the Senate.

How heavily weighted is that 49% to the ultra-blue states? Yes in CA and NY a vast majority favor impeachment but once you leave those two liberal bastions the numbers swing very heavily in the other direction. Those two states only control 84 electoral votes. This impeachment is not playing well in middle America where the Dems are going to have to improve vastly in order to retake the White House.

You are always very enamored with presidential approval polls, how do you think Congress fares in those polls?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html

19%, less than 1-in-5 Americans approve of the job Congress is doing. Do you really think a partisan impeachment is going to improve those numbers?

This impeachment is going to blow up in the face of the Dems. Especially when a known and consistent liar is the point man.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

lol Pelosi is fooked - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/9 07:55:54
     Pelosi is trying to tame a wild horse that can't be broke. - None**** MU - 10/9 08:22:22
          No on first points and on second, they need a solid atty to - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 10:16:26
     She doesn't have to do any of that(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 08:02:29
          lol those are literally the only two options - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/9 08:05:11
               Why do you think she needs to rush - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 08:07:33
                    so clear that she won't even hold a vote? - Sal MU - 10/9 08:39:24
                         No need to hold the vote - sorry chumps - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 09:51:57
                    lol yes so clear she can't risk an open vote on an inquiry - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/9 08:16:43
                         Time to grow up son(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 09:52:29
                         It's a means to and end with rask and the dems - mizzouSECedes STL - 10/9 08:46:37
                         RE: lol yes so clear she can't risk an open vote on an inquiry - scan MU - 10/9 08:19:36
                    Rask-putin with still another look into our future. Nm - hokie VT - 10/9 08:11:18
                         He has embarrassingly little shame(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/9 08:13:35
                              Only decent people experience shame. Last night Hannity - hokie VT - 10/9 08:21:50
                              RE: He has embarrassingly little shame(nm) - scan MU - 10/9 08:14:47
                    Please lay out the case - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 10/9 08:10:37
     The problem for Nancy is that she was forced into this by - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/9 08:01:22
          If that’s true, is The Chest stupid enough to trust - hokie VT - 10/9 08:09:10
          Newsflash - The House will develop a case and then impeach - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 08:06:20
               Damned you are stupid. 49% is not even a majority. - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/9 08:48:37
                    Idiot boy - the voters will remove him, the Dems expose him(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/9 09:53:39
               Still don't know what he will be charged with - mizzouSECedes STL - 10/9 08:47:53
                    Charged with defeating fat Hillary and making them all look - hokie VT - 10/9 09:00:35
               So says the mystic from the east. Will the charges include - hokie VT - 10/9 08:30:12




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard