Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

This is not about removing the man

Posted on: October 2, 2019 at 14:52:44 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
188057
Member For:
24.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Though it IS interesting whether there would be anything that the GOP Senate would move on. Right now it does not seem so - and THAT mi amigo - is a condemnation of the GOP Senate.

This is about exposure. Don has about 14 months to go. Per relevancy less than that.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

WH instructed to preserve documents - Ace AU - 10/2 14:22:03
     It was a Judge {not the Justic dept.) as part of a suit by - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/2 14:43:11
     Because Hillary destroyed documents - Spanky KU - 10/2 14:42:57
          LOCK HER UP!! - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/2 14:47:09
               Trump was advised to let her off the hook after the media - Spanky KU - 10/2 14:55:56
                    Who advised Trump, and why would he agree to do that? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/2 15:23:10
                         It's as if you slept through that announcement by trump - Spanky KU - 10/2 15:56:49
                         Sounds like complete typical spanky BS - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/2 15:38:30
                              You are an idiot! From November 2016: - Spanky KU - 10/2 15:57:51
                              and even though she's guilty as hell, Donnie Large Bottom - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/2 15:44:45
     We have a word for that. Tick Tock, Tick Tock - raskolnikov MU - 10/2 14:40:51
          There’s another word too. That word is imbecility - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/2 14:47:14
          Lol - Panthera MU - 10/2 14:42:05
     We have a word for that. Tick Tock, Tick Tock - raskolnikov MU - 10/2 14:29:14
          RE: We have a word for that. Tick Tock, Tick Tock - scan MU - 10/2 14:33:32
               This is not about removing the man - raskolnikov MU - 10/2 14:52:44
                    are you going to wait 11 minutes and post this again? - Panthera MU - 10/2 14:58:31
                    RE: This is not about removing the man - scan MU - 10/2 14:55:53
                         So your take is that exposing him destroys him? Wow(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/2 16:05:56
               An office boy and food fetcher for a chick run - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/2 14:34:41
                    You have no idea what you are talking about(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/2 14:54:18
                         Direct hit! You can always tell when it is true because - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/2 15:07:50
                              Sorry to disappoint - raskolnikov MU - 10/2 16:10:04
                                   Wow, more of a bullseye than I thought. You were a - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/2 17:07:48
                         and yet - Panthera MU - 10/2 15:00:32
          Tick tock, tick tock is a word? I have a word for you. - Emoji Man MSU - 10/2 14:33:01
     Standard crap a lawyer would tell a client - mu7176grad MU - 10/2 14:27:17
          Yet, under the Presidential Records Act, documents - Ace AU - 10/2 14:29:14
               Why do lawyers tell clients the same thing over and over - mu7176grad MU - 10/2 14:37:09
     So Barr can destroy them all at once. Very efficient that - Floyd Turbo 99 - 10/2 14:23:44
     what are you afraid of - Panthera MU - 10/2 14:23:32
     lol there is no WB ...this is all done (nm) - Sal CMSU - 10/2 14:22:47




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard