 |
|
I'll say again, getting dirt on a pol opponent is fine. From
Posted on: September 29, 2019 at 09:07:41 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68171
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
anywhere at anytime.
Ex girlfriends, business partners, foreign countries.
If trump or the Rs had any reason to believe joe and his drug addled kid cheated and benefited personally from joe's tenure as VP to the most corrupt president in our history, trump or anyone connected with him should try to find out more.
Seems there was pretty good reason to investigate. A worthless druggie who happens to be the son of the vice president of the united states gets a cushy seven figure gig to do things he knows absolutely nothing about. He doesn't know energy, he doesn't know ukraine, he doesn't know the players.
But he's the son of the vice president of the united states.
He knows joe.
Should republicans and trump make a conscious decision NOT TO investigate biden...BECAUSE he was obama's VP and BECAUSE he's a political opponent of trump.
He gets a pass?
Or should we wait for the NYTimes and CNN to do their best investigative journalism and plumb the depths of this corruption?
Or maybe the deep state with dedicated, non partisan, unbiased career public servants can get the information...?
Ya think?
The american people deserve to know the truth, no matter the source.
The part that constantly trips up the socialists is; THE TRUTH.
The truth does not include:
Fabricated stories about urinating hookers in moscow.
Fabricated stories by a nut bag who claims she was attacked by a SCOTUS nominee but doesn't actually recall where, when or who else was there.
A second fabrication this time by the renowned NYTimes against the same nominee but this time the alleged victim is not even the one making the accusation...as she has no recollection of the fabricated event.
Or with mitt romney, fabricating a FIFTY YEAR OLD story about him being a bully in prep school.
If hitler, stalin and mao had made allegations against truman that were TRUE and verifiable, provable and demonstrable....would we not want the evidence because it came from hitler, stalin and mao? (Maybe a bad example since stalin and mao were communists and libs always believe and trust communists).
Is the truth determined by the source of the truth, or the facts?
Libs, do you want to know if biden used his influence to get his rotten kid a do nothing job with russians?
Do you want to know if Uranium One sold precious american uranium to russia?
Do you want to know if the clinton foundation laundered money and sold influence to fat hillary presidency?
Are you so sure those events did not happen that you are not interested in even investigating them?
Are you as sure of that as you are that trump hired urinating hookers in moscow...?
As sure as the russians were paid by trump to rig the election?
How certain are you, really?
Edited by hokie at 09:08:58 on 09/29/19
Ex girlfriends, business partners, foreign countries.
If trump or the Rs had any reason to believe joe and his drug addled kid cheated and benefited personally from joe's tenure as VP to the most corrupt president in our history, trump or anyone connected with him should try to find out more.
Seems there was pretty good reason to investigate. A worthless druggie who happens to be the son of the vice president of the united states gets a cushy seven figure gig to do things he knows absolutely nothing about. He doesn't know energy, he doesn't know ukraine, he doesn't know the players.
But he's the son of the vice president of the united states.
He knows joe.
Should republicans and trump make a conscious decision NOT TO investigate biden...BECAUSE he was obama's VP and BECAUSE he's a political opponent of trump.
He gets a pass?
Or should we wait for the NYTimes and CNN to do their best investigative journalism and plumb the depths of this corruption?
Or maybe the deep state with dedicated, non partisan, unbiased career public servants can get the information...?
Ya think?
The american people deserve to know the truth, no matter the source.
The part that constantly trips up the socialists is; THE TRUTH.
The truth does not include:
Fabricated stories about urinating hookers in moscow.
Fabricated stories by a nut bag who claims she was attacked by a SCOTUS nominee but doesn't actually recall where, when or who else was there.
A second fabrication this time by the renowned NYTimes against the same nominee but this time the alleged victim is not even the one making the accusation...as she has no recollection of the fabricated event.
Or with mitt romney, fabricating a FIFTY YEAR OLD story about him being a bully in prep school.
If hitler, stalin and mao had made allegations against truman that were TRUE and verifiable, provable and demonstrable....would we not want the evidence because it came from hitler, stalin and mao? (Maybe a bad example since stalin and mao were communists and libs always believe and trust communists).
Is the truth determined by the source of the truth, or the facts?
Libs, do you want to know if biden used his influence to get his rotten kid a do nothing job with russians?
Do you want to know if Uranium One sold precious american uranium to russia?
Do you want to know if the clinton foundation laundered money and sold influence to fat hillary presidency?
Are you so sure those events did not happen that you are not interested in even investigating them?
Are you as sure of that as you are that trump hired urinating hookers in moscow...?
As sure as the russians were paid by trump to rig the election?
How certain are you, really?
Edited by hokie at 09:08:58 on 09/29/19
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
I'll say again, getting dirt on a pol opponent is fine. From - hokie VT - 9/29 09:07:41