Welcome Guest

Sorry, I guess that I'll have to point out that I was merely

Posted on: September 26, 2019 at 18:39:00 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
mocking your earlier post.

We don't know if there was "leaking" of classified information. That's by design, since we don't know the whistleblower's position and exactly how he/she came in possession of this information. The times has put something out - but that's not a certainty (it could be a smokescreen to shield the wb identity), and it doesn't detail how the information was obtained (i.e. was it in the wb's job function or was it office gossip?)
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     It's actually a constitutional 'duty' to leak early and - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 9/26 18:36:36
     classified? I thought you said that the whistleblower was - tigerdb MU - 9/26 18:29:27
          Uhhh did you not see redacted information - Sal CMSU - 9/26 18:30:22
               Sorry, I guess that I'll have to point out that I was merely - tigerdb MU - 9/26 18:39:00
               Only a full-on retard would think a presidents conversation - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 9/26 18:38:35
     RE: I'm guessing Schiff and other dems may not - Tigrrrr! MU - 9/26 18:21:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard