Welcome Guest

Libs are right about this one. The gun cost extra lives. If

Posted on: September 19, 2019 at 07:03:59 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
61340
Member For:
8.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the guy didn’t have a gun in his home he would have been killed. That’s one dead. Just one insignificant 61 year old military veteran. No big deal.

Instead, there are two dead young men. Two fine young men in the prime of their lives. Cut down by an evil AR – 15.

So, if there had not been a gun in the house, only one person would be dead. But because of the battlefield weapon, two are dead. That is a 100% increase in gun rated fatalities.

Something must be done about guns.

Edited by hokie at 07:06:14 on 09/19/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     As though he couldn't have done the exact same thing - MrBlueSky MU - 9/19 07:20:21
          Superiority through firepower..... - Tigrrrr! MU - 9/19 07:30:17
               Lol, combat shooting - MrBlueSky MU - 9/19 09:10:57
     Libs are right about this one. The gun cost extra lives. If - hokie VT - 9/19 07:03:59
     Or a AK - 47 - Uncle Fester USMC - 9/18 22:24:31




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard