Costs 2 to 3 times as much, and isn't capable of replacing fossil fuels?
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Natural gas, coal, nukes provide 82.8% of all electricity.
Hydropower is 7%, and we aren't building anymore giant dams. prog's dems will sue to stop any proposed.
So, you idiots fantasize out replacing 82.8% of our electricity with something that's currently producing a mere 10%? requiring scaling up 800%?
solar's a laughable 1.6%, wind 6.6%. Best sites already used, yet somehow you plan to grow both to 82%?
Pure fantasy bullshyte.