Welcome Guest

But that does not prove the converse

Posted on: July 24, 2019 at 09:58:23 CT

Mormad MU

Posts:

56714

Member For:

18.73 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

it just states that you couldn't indict him for that reason. It does not prove that you could have indicted him otherwise. That's the leap that folks want to make that isn't necessarily true.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

"The reason you did not indict Donald Trump... is because of - MrBlueSky MU - 7/24 09:56:31

unfortunately for Mueller there are many witnesses to him - blake1771 KC - 7/24 10:03:15

That is a contradiction of when he chose not to indict for - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/24 10:01:28

That doesn't mean that was the sole reason - Sal KC - 7/24 10:01:16

did you see what he just said about the joint statement? - blake1771 KC - 7/24 10:08:56

I'm not watching lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/24 10:09:50

That is the theoretical reason he could not go there - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/24 10:00:13

Mueller just answered that he believed there was - MrBlueSky MU - 7/24 10:01:15

No, he did not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/24 10:03:04

Yet he chose not to indict on Russian Collusion... - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/24 10:02:34

But that does not prove the converse - Mormad MU - 7/24 09:58:23

correct ... and Blue knows this (nm) - Sal KC - 7/24 10:09:08