 |
|
Mueller needed an extra week to find a way to re-open the
Posted on: July 22, 2019 at 08:29:35 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68248
Member For:
9.69 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
door on collusion.
He has to walk a fine line between saying there might be collusion this week, after a two-year report that showed there was none.
Has new evidence come to light?
Is he just so incompetent that he couldn’t find Russian collusion when all of the members of the Democratic caucus in the house of reprehensibles and the raskol know that there is conclusive proof, not just evidence… Real solid proof, that Trump colluded with the Russians.
Seems everyone knows it except the guy who did a two year study, interviewed hundreds of people, spent tens of millions of dollars, who’s sole purpose in life for two years was to FIND SOMETHING, and had only Trump hating investigators crawling through every bit of activity by anyone on his staff for two years trying to do it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if his office were working with the house offices to figure out what questions to ask and how they should be answered.
They just had congressman Nadler on saying how they well ask Mueller to read page 273, paragraph four and comment on it. Anyone here think that they haven’t told Mueller which pages and paragraphs he will need to, “rethink“? That scenario sounds time-consuming to me. And the Republicans when they have a chance to ask will ask more succinct direct questions.
I am still not sure the testimony will come off. This seems really really stupid for the socialists. I also think that if it does come off, Nadler, and the Schiff hole will try to install rules to hamstring rebuttal questions by the Republicans. Maybe something to limit the scope of the questions to a very narrow and well-defined a list of topics.
He has to walk a fine line between saying there might be collusion this week, after a two-year report that showed there was none.
Has new evidence come to light?
Is he just so incompetent that he couldn’t find Russian collusion when all of the members of the Democratic caucus in the house of reprehensibles and the raskol know that there is conclusive proof, not just evidence… Real solid proof, that Trump colluded with the Russians.
Seems everyone knows it except the guy who did a two year study, interviewed hundreds of people, spent tens of millions of dollars, who’s sole purpose in life for two years was to FIND SOMETHING, and had only Trump hating investigators crawling through every bit of activity by anyone on his staff for two years trying to do it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if his office were working with the house offices to figure out what questions to ask and how they should be answered.
They just had congressman Nadler on saying how they well ask Mueller to read page 273, paragraph four and comment on it. Anyone here think that they haven’t told Mueller which pages and paragraphs he will need to, “rethink“? That scenario sounds time-consuming to me. And the Republicans when they have a chance to ask will ask more succinct direct questions.
I am still not sure the testimony will come off. This seems really really stupid for the socialists. I also think that if it does come off, Nadler, and the Schiff hole will try to install rules to hamstring rebuttal questions by the Republicans. Maybe something to limit the scope of the questions to a very narrow and well-defined a list of topics.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Mueller needed an extra week to find a way to re-open the - hokie VT - 7/22 08:29:35