Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

If that were true then what was the point of Mueller’s

Posted on: July 21, 2019 at 17:13:43 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
48365
Member For:
16.23 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
investigation? He was working for the DOJ not Congress. If he could not bring charges against the president then the investigation would have taken a single day, it took two years.

I also find it amazing that there was this vast conspiracy to obstruct justice but only a single person was involved. The President may be protected but none of his people were, where are their indictments? Even if they were just bit players there would still have been indictments to uncover the details.

Zero, again for emphasis ZERO, indictments against Americans for working with Russia or obstruction of justice. Yet you still laughingly proclaim there is jail time coming for our current President.

You are amazing!
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Coverup not as good as billed - JG A - 7/21 16:40:23
     And the Declass will be the end of that demonRat coverup - Uncle Fester USMC - 7/21 17:27:45
     Thank you Mr. Yahoo (nm) - Fourth and Long MU - 7/21 17:11:06
     That will be torpedoed with one question from the GOP, - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/21 17:06:10
          Tell that to all the schmucks the FBI entraps - JG A - 7/21 18:01:08
          RE: That will be torpedoed with one question from the GOP, - sarasotatiger MU - 7/21 17:53:23
               In our criminal system absence of proof is the same as - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/21 18:04:08
     leave it to you to believe Nadler - Spanky KU - 7/21 17:03:33
     If Nadler and Yahoo say it - mu7176grad MU - 7/21 16:52:55
          Mueller's report says it(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 16:58:06
               Sigh, you can't do math, apparently can't read either. - RHAYWORTH MU - 7/21 17:54:16
               No(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/21 17:35:32
               Well Impeach him then you Imbecile - Uncle Fester USMC - 7/21 17:31:12
               Which again proves what a Trump stooge Mueller is - Floyd Turbo 99 - 7/21 17:10:17
               Nope....try again - Spanky KU - 7/21 17:08:58
               Which has been out for months - mu7176grad MU - 7/21 17:07:31
                    Yes it has been out - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 18:12:02
     Still got them no collusion, no obstruction blues...nm - MUTGR MU - 7/21 16:51:05
          Where did you hear that? Was that Trump following the Bundy - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 17:00:33
               where did you not hear that?(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/21 17:20:27
     Very interesting election coming up that has a president - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 16:49:48
          What criminal charges? nm. - MUTGR MU - 7/21 16:52:45
               RE: What criminal charges? nm. - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 16:55:43
                    lol (nm) - pickle MU - 7/21 17:21:42
                    Fail(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/21 17:19:36
                         You are really deep into this trump kool aid(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 18:13:12
                    Obstructing justice? How? Mueller didn't recommend - MUTGR MU - 7/21 16:57:13
                         Could not indict a sitting president, do you not get that - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 16:59:29
                              lol, nice place to hide on this topic, rask. (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 7/21 17:32:30
                              If that were true then what was the point of Mueller’s - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/21 17:13:43
                                   Found evidence on Collusion and then counts of obstruction - raskolnikov MU - 7/21 18:17:23
                                        Congressional indictments are the worst kind of - Floyd Turbo 99 - 7/21 20:32:15
                                        Your willful ignorance is truly amazing. You really want - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/21 20:31:18
                                   Rask is even worse at law than he is at politics and that's - MUTGR MU - 7/21 17:56:57
                              No case, did you not get that part? Was that over your - MUTGR MU - 7/21 17:03:16
                                   RE: No case, did you not get that part? Was that over your - scan MU - 7/21 17:04:25
     Yahoo lol(nm) - DollarSigns MU - 7/21 16:46:56
     Like dead thetans from a volcano, it was bound to get out. - Emoji Man MSU - 7/21 16:41:59




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard