Here is the city's logic for defending her not getting

Posted on: July 19, 2019 at 23:32:30 CT

notices.. remember she had moved out three years prior.

can ascertain
from an examination of the City’s Answers t0 Interrogatories and Response t0 Request
for Production on file With this Court in support of this Motion for Summary Judgment, a
Notice of Violation was mailed to Respondent at 1658 Douglas Avenue, Dunedin, on
January 22nd 2014 but returned to sender With no forwarding address, in spite of the fact
that the Pinellas County Property Appraiser and Pinellas County Tax Collector data both
reflected that the owner of 1658 Douglas Avenue, Dunedin, was Ms. Kristi Hill, and that
her mailing address was 1658 Douglas Avenue, Dunedin.
The record also reflects that:
o On April 22nd 2014, the City mailed Respondent notice of the Code Enforcement
Board’s May 6th 2014 meeting at Which they were to hear the initial Violation
citation;
o On May 15th 2014, the City mailed Respondent the CEB’s initial order of May
14th requiring compliance by June 15th 2014;
o On June 16th 2014, the City mailed Respondent notice of the CEB’s July 15‘ 2014
meeting at which they would consider whether Respondent had complied with its
initial order; and
o On July 11th 2014, the City mailed Respondent a copy of the executed CEB order
finding her still out of compliance, imposing a $100 per day fine until compliance
was achieved, and creating a lien “on any real or personal property that is owned
by you.”
It is of no legal moment that Respondent failed to provide a forwarding address, and/or
otherwise declined to sign for the certified mail attempted to be provided to her.