 |
|
RE: Lol... Normally I'd come up with a response, but I am at
Posted on: July 10, 2019 at 00:48:10 CT
Uncle Fester USMC
Posts:
83051
Member For:
20.03 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Ultimately for elitists, truth is not the issue – control is. Timothy Wirth, who currently heads the United Nations Foundation, said, “We’ve got to ride this global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” (Michael Fumento, Science Under Siege: Balancing Technology and the Environment (William Morrow & Company, 1993), p. 362)
The Club of Rome, which consults with the U.N., has searched for appropriate bogeymen, in an effort to frighten the masses and herd them into uniting under the watchful eyes of Big Brother:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. …” (Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution (New York: Pantheon Books, 1991), p. 115)
Incredibly, Stanford professor of climatology Stephen Schneider, who has been the lead author of several U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, sees no problem in using the threat of global warming to scare people to death, even if it means being dishonest:
“We need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s imagination … so we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts. … Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.” (Jonathan Schell, Our Fragile Earth (Discover, October 1989); p. 44, emphasis mine)
Christine Stewart, the former Canadian minister of the environment, unabashedly told editors and reporters for the Calgary Herald that using pseudoscience, no matter how phony, is permissible if the objective is to bring about a New World Order:
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony … climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” (Calgary Herald, Dec. 14, 1998)
All of this looms even more ominous for the United States as President Obama will be in Copenhagen on Dec. 10, as a precursor to signing the climate-change treaty. While world leaders have been rather deft in relating what exactly they will be signing us up for, Lord Christopher Monckton, the former adviser to Margaret Thatcher who has read the 181-page draft, divulged that it calls for a “new world government” and warned Americans that “unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your prosperity away forever.”
Related:
Haha !!
The Club of Rome, which consults with the U.N., has searched for appropriate bogeymen, in an effort to frighten the masses and herd them into uniting under the watchful eyes of Big Brother:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. …” (Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution (New York: Pantheon Books, 1991), p. 115)
Incredibly, Stanford professor of climatology Stephen Schneider, who has been the lead author of several U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, sees no problem in using the threat of global warming to scare people to death, even if it means being dishonest:
“We need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s imagination … so we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts. … Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.” (Jonathan Schell, Our Fragile Earth (Discover, October 1989); p. 44, emphasis mine)
Christine Stewart, the former Canadian minister of the environment, unabashedly told editors and reporters for the Calgary Herald that using pseudoscience, no matter how phony, is permissible if the objective is to bring about a New World Order:
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony … climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” (Calgary Herald, Dec. 14, 1998)
All of this looms even more ominous for the United States as President Obama will be in Copenhagen on Dec. 10, as a precursor to signing the climate-change treaty. While world leaders have been rather deft in relating what exactly they will be signing us up for, Lord Christopher Monckton, the former adviser to Margaret Thatcher who has read the 181-page draft, divulged that it calls for a “new world government” and warned Americans that “unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your prosperity away forever.”
Related:
Haha !!
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
RE: Lol... Normally I'd come up with a response, but I am at - Uncle Fester USMC - 7/10 00:48:10