Welcome Guest

This new kool aid very exciting for you isn't it

Posted on: June 4, 2019 at 07:34:15 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
187505
Member For:
24.58 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The Nut on impeachment is that its pursuit would give Trump the capacity to claim full exoneration by the Senate on his impeachable offense presented by the Mueller Report but subsequently falsely promoted as non-existent by Trump and his puppet AG, Mr Barr.

It frankly comes down to trying to secure greater political gains. McConnell commented that he would stymie any impeachment effort in the Senate.

We have been over this - not doing it again. Oh Obama has nothing to do with it. I guess THAT seed is being pursued pretty hard by Trump TV, so you all will believe, I imagine, what you hear.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     This new kool aid very exciting for you isn't it - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 07:34:15
          They don't want the trial. All of the information - tman MU - 6/4 08:05:25
               ROFLMFAO - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:19:24
                    more laughing - dangertim MU - 6/4 08:35:01
                    Ras, you got no A left. Already too much ROF and L.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 6/4 08:26:09
                    Typical(nm) - tman MU - 6/4 08:22:12
          Obama has EVERYTHING to do with it, moron. - RHAYWORTH MU - 6/4 07:59:54
               Wow, you sure gulp that down in big slugs(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:02:47
                    some more of you guzzling that koolaid - dangertim MU - 6/4 08:24:29
                    speaking of... - dangertim MU - 6/4 08:11:16
                         I'm guessing most of these original points can be found - Floyd Turbo 99 - 6/4 08:24:53
                         RE: speaking of... - scan MU - 6/4 08:22:39
                              Guess what - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:27:31
                                   FACT!!!! Lol. TB’s dumbest poster never fails to disappoint. - Emoji Man MSU - 6/4 09:02:49
                                   RE: Guess what - scan MU - 6/4 08:31:50
                         Classic. What say you Rask(nm) - tman MU - 6/4 08:19:15
                              "After ten long years they let him out of the home - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:24:13
                                   nice deflection(nm) - dangertim MU - 6/4 08:25:00
                                        Given the option b/t laying out my soul or a great Warren - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:29:18
                                        He will slink away on his bad knee shortly(nm) - tman MU - 6/4 08:28:48
                    RE: Wow, you sure gulp that down in big slugs(nm) - scan MU - 6/4 08:08:24
          Oh noooooo....not greater political gains. How outrageous - GA Tiger MU - 6/4 07:48:50
          RE: This new kool aid very exciting for you isn't it - None**** MU - 6/4 07:46:39
               I have made that very argument on this board re: hearings - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 07:55:14
                    If you really believed what you say about Putin/Russia's - None**** MU - 6/4 08:04:15
                         Go to town, way less there than you think(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 10:57:31
          RE: This new kool aid very exciting for you isn't it - scan MU - 6/4 07:42:38
          What exactly are dems wanting to impeach - Sal KC - 6/4 07:35:32
               You might want to keep up now and again - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 07:38:06
                    lol Lunatic liar(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 6/4 07:59:10
                    RE: You might want to keep up now and again - None**** MU - 6/4 07:50:13
                         ONE instance of obstructing justice is due cause to impeach - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:00:51
                              RE: ONE instance of obstructing justice is due cause to impeach - None**** MU - 6/4 08:05:32
                                   RE: ONE instance of obstructing justice is due cause to impeach - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:32:38
                                        Can't you cite even one incidence of obstruction of justice? - None**** MU - 6/4 08:49:02
                                             I cited a few. Thanks(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 09:38:49
                                   Can you name one - None**** MU - 6/4 08:25:11
                                        RE: Can you name one - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 09:39:33
                                             That isn't a valid response. Can you cite one incident - None**** MU - 6/4 09:46:46
                                                  Have done that several times(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 10:03:09
                    He should be hung first and then impeached - mu7176grad MU - 6/4 07:43:11
                         No need CNN on this, I am reading the Mueller Report(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 07:47:45
                              Let me know when you find the Collusion - mu7176grad MU - 6/4 08:12:54
                                   I have covered that many, many times. thanks - raskolnikov MU - 6/4 08:34:30




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard