Welcome Guest

RE: What law has Trump broken? (nm)

Posted on: May 28, 2019 at 09:41:39 CT
raskolnikov MU
Posts:
187641
Member For:
24.65 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He has obstructed justice. He continues to operate his corporations on the side and they prove a violation of emoluments clause, you know, clause in the US Constitution.

They may also get the family on Tax frand and money laundering.

There was a time you obstruct justice at the highest level once and there would be calls for action across the board. He has ten instances and it appears to be nothing but ho hum, it's just Trump being Trump.

Again, why have a national defense? Why a military? What are we defending? There is no rule of law, I guess but for the peasants.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     That is an interesting issue, Sal. I am of two minds - hokie VT - 5/28 09:37:45
          Is the president above the law? - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:47:19
               There are ways to indict a sitting president - Sal KC - 5/28 09:49:34
                    Not if you are a member of the DOJ(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:51:48
                         What? (nm) - Sal KC - 5/28 09:52:13
     They should well proceed with hearings but then stop - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:31:43
          What law has Trump broken? (nm) - Sal KC - 5/28 09:32:43
               RE: What law has Trump broken? (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:41:39
                    Lol pawn(nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 5/28 12:20:54
                    So outside of dem talking points - Sal KC - 5/28 09:45:52
                         Evidence, good one. The raskol has already determined - hokie VT - 5/28 09:56:08
                              RE: Evidence, good one. The raskol has already determined - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:57:35
                                   “Evidence suggests...” maybe to you and others who got the - hokie VT - 5/28 10:07:08
                         Ten instances of obstruction, they are quite clear - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:50:44
                              No and no - Sal KC - 5/28 09:51:47
                                   In fact, I can Shorty - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 09:59:05
                                        and OJ was found innocent. Damn you are dumb(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU - 5/28 10:00:17
                                             OJ Was not found innocent - raskolnikov MU - 5/28 10:03:06
                                                  "innocent until proven guilty" (nm) - Sal KC - 5/28 10:04:22
                                        Odd comparison considering - Sal KC - 5/28 10:00:16
                    what a pile of dem progressive nonsense. - RHAYWORTH MU - 5/28 09:44:21
               The Ten Commandments Law(nm) - Toger STL - 5/28 09:34:33




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard