Welcome Guest

I don't think they need to see the completely unredacted

Posted on: May 10, 2019 at 17:41:43 CT
limenats MU
Posts:
3778
Member For:
25.70 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
version with regard to "collusion" or obstruction. Criminal conspiracy was not established. I believe obstruction was but Barr is not going to charge the President.

There was redacted information about ongoing investigations in the redacted version provided earlier. Are those still redacted in the less redacted version? I don't know.

I am concerned about Trump and his AG interfering in those investigations so I'd certainly want to know what they are and see the underlying material.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Lol no dems have read less redacted mueller report - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/10 17:18:17
     They can't keep up the narrative if they look at it.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 17:28:38
          I don't think they need to see the completely unredacted - limenats MU - 5/10 17:41:43
               how do you obstruct an investigation when there is no crime? - SoCalTigr UM - 5/10 18:01:39
                    Ask bill clinton - JayHoaxH8r MU - 5/10 18:14:19
               No...there was no obstruction. - Logan BAMA - 5/10 17:53:22
               They should go and find out.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 5/10 17:53:21
     If I were Nadler, I'd be curious to see what the 14 ongoing - limenats MU - 5/10 17:23:54
     Puritans without sin.(nm) - Toger STL - 5/10 17:19:49




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard