Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

yes

Posted on: April 24, 2019 at 16:15:14 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
there would have to be sufficient basis the juvenile office to open an investigation and for a judge to determine both that the kid staying in the home is contrary to his welfare and that the juvenile office made reasonable efforts to prevent the need for removal (or more likely here, an emergency impacting his physical health).

it's not an indication of guilt, but it is multiple layers of people determining something very not right happened.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So what are the chances the Chiefs still cut him? I guess - mizzou541 MU - 4/24 15:46:19
     KC said they cut Hunt because he lied to them...or that's - playhard KC - 4/24 16:12:41
          Why would they lie about that and if they did lie about it - kmawv8 MU - 4/24 16:16:34
               I didn't say the Chiefs lied, i do question if Hunt gets - playhard KC - 4/24 16:20:37
     Yeah, the cut him and he ends up a Raider - MU_gz MU - 4/24 15:57:46
     I was wondering the same thing. Knowing Clark Hunt I think - Carlos Rossi KC - 4/24 15:53:27
          Yeah and it's pretty clear he did it and she's keeping quiet - mizzou541 MU - 4/24 15:54:25
               How is it pretty clear? - Cosmo MU - 4/24 16:00:56
                    What if the child is just an exhuberant masturbater - Mormad MU - 4/24 16:04:46
                         ask kaw (nm) - Cosmo MU - 4/24 16:05:36
     accusation = guilty = awful - ChinaTiger KC - 4/24 15:47:57
          Circumstantial evidence and the fact - Eggs KC - 4/24 15:56:36
               Great man. I'd let him babysit (nm) - TheWildcat STL - 4/24 15:58:13
          Taking the kid away is somewhat telling(nm) - tbluck MU - 4/24 15:54:40
               It is literally standard procedure in a case like this - Cosmo MU - 4/24 15:58:53
                    Absolutely nothing, SOP. Uh huh(nm) - tbluck MU - 4/24 16:01:00
                         That is correct. Taking the child out of the home - Cosmo MU - 4/24 16:02:24
                              yes - gmmm98 MU - 4/24 16:15:14
                              I'm not an attorney. My guess is they don't take children - tbluck MU - 4/24 16:07:50
                                   Yes, they do, in cases of suspected abuse - Mormad MU - 4/24 16:09:15
                                   They take a child from the home EVERY time there's an - kmawv8 MU - 4/24 16:08:52
                                        Ok. And if they aren't returned? (nm) - tbluck MU - 4/24 16:10:21
                                             That's awfully different than saying taking the kid is - kmawv8 MU - 4/24 16:12:26
                                                  they CAN'T say. Proceedings in most juvenile courts - Doc Stone MU - 4/24 16:29:46
                                                  I don't think they've said. He was taken March 15?(nm) - tbluck MU - 4/24 16:15:12
                                                       So, you admit your first statement was dumb - kmawv8 MU - 4/24 16:18:05
                                                            Of course he won't admit that - Cosmo MU - 4/24 16:25:26
                                                            Ha! No.(nm) - tbluck MU - 4/24 16:24:33
                                             Nike was hiring(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/24 16:11:50
                                        Exactly (nm) - Cosmo MU - 4/24 16:09:48
                                   I take children from their home all the time - kaw(nm) - cnk ATL - 4/24 16:08:47
          I mean....we KNOW he's done bad stuff before(nm) - TheWildcat STL - 4/24 15:52:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard