Which of his takes do you disagree with?
Posted on: April 20, 2019 at 09:11:48 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
57212
Member For:
23.15 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He's a judicial "expert", presenting his take on facts determined in the course of the investigation.
The real issue is whether a sitting potus could be prosecuted for obstruction. Certainly he could be charged for obstruction after leaving offices.
Telling/encouraging witnesses to lie to investigators is not a good look for a potus.