 |
|
Rs have to prove their innocence. Is that how it works? And
Posted on: April 19, 2019 at 07:32:00 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68139
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
jussie the wussie has his charges dropped by a sympathetic (or just pathetic) black prosecutor.
According to you for example, kavanaugh is guilty because his accuser had no reason to lie and he did not conclusively prove that he did not do something.
Is that how it works?
Meanwhile jussie the wussie did nothing wrong, i guess.
Lower standards.
James comey admitted in open session that he arranged to leak documents to his professor friend at columbia...with the express purpose of generating a special counsel. No problem.
Fat hillary erased subpoenaed emails, destroyed sym cards, and smashed computers and cell phones.
You mean like with a cloth...? No problem.
They had to be proven guilty, Rs have to prove their innocence.
Is that how it works....?
Edited by hokie at 08:13:30 on 04/19/19
According to you for example, kavanaugh is guilty because his accuser had no reason to lie and he did not conclusively prove that he did not do something.
Is that how it works?
Meanwhile jussie the wussie did nothing wrong, i guess.
Lower standards.
James comey admitted in open session that he arranged to leak documents to his professor friend at columbia...with the express purpose of generating a special counsel. No problem.
Fat hillary erased subpoenaed emails, destroyed sym cards, and smashed computers and cell phones.
You mean like with a cloth...? No problem.
They had to be proven guilty, Rs have to prove their innocence.
Is that how it works....?
Edited by hokie at 08:13:30 on 04/19/19
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
you can let that rattle around in your oxygen deprived brain - Ragnar Danneskjold MU
- 4/19 07:50:27Rs have to prove their innocence. Is that how it works? And - hokie VT - 4/19 07:32:00