Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Why? Because they were relying on the Steele Dossier

Posted on: April 2, 2019 at 14:41:49 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
144998
Member For:
20.86 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
and unfounded accusations to disqualify the people?

Given Trump was 100% certain that there was no collusion with Russia, why would he disqualify someone from a clearance based on UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS that they were involved in Russian Collusion? The fact that the Mueller report also confirmed there was no Russian Collusion simply proves Trump correct...

Agreed?

http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16202518
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Trump over-rode Intel protocol 25 times to give top clearanc - raskolnikov MU - 4/2 14:24:34
     Just another item in the long, long list of proof that Trump - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 4/2 15:25:53
     LOL, this thread didn't go as planned (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 4/2 14:50:17
          In this thread it's been proven the Obama admin - Sal KC - 4/2 14:59:21
               It's never been proven the Obama admin did the same - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 15:00:48
                    Now you're comparing total numbers? - Sal KC - 4/2 15:03:03
     You do know Obama loosened regulations regarding - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/2 14:44:17
          No--he worships Obama - mu7176grad MU - 4/2 14:57:43
          Yep and here's a link - Sal KC - 4/2 14:49:04
               Many on the left here are allergic to google(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 4/2 14:55:27
     Why? Because they were relying on the Steele Dossier - Spanky KU - 4/2 14:41:49
          Yep. These same people tried to keep intel from President - North co-co champs MU - 4/2 14:45:35
          Do we know that's where they were getting the info? - Sal KC - 4/2 14:42:42
               It will be interesting to see who the people that the - Spanky KU - 4/2 14:48:47
                    Correct, I'd like to see the names - Sal KC - 4/2 14:49:33
                         Yep.. me too, - Spanky KU - 4/2 14:53:23
     I think one was a janitor. (nm) - Logan BAMA - 4/2 14:37:56
     Good thing you’re not a Dem, right? (nm) - pickle MU - 4/2 14:37:37
     Coming from the CIA Post. That's rich (nm) - North co-co champs MU - 4/2 14:36:27
     samantha powers unmasked over 260 people. - RHAYWORTH MU - 4/2 14:33:32
          lol oops (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:34:34
     The whistleblower will get thrown under the bus on this - playhard KC - 4/2 14:29:22
          That she served under Bush does not clear her of - Spanky KU - 4/2 14:42:50
               Might increase the odds(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/2 14:44:56
          She made some pretty wild claims - Sal KC - 4/2 14:30:18
          She already has been. And she's already been retaliated - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:30:15
               Did they raise the height of the toilets and not provide her - Spanky KU - 4/2 17:06:17
               One wonders WHICH act of senseless mean cruelty will take - raskolnikov MU - 4/2 14:33:45
                    What abuse? - Spanky KU - 4/2 17:06:51
                    It'll be viewed as disloyalty on her behalf(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/2 14:37:59
                    How is granting security clearances an act of cruelty? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:35:10
                         I’m sure he means being cruel to sawed off little shrimps - Floyd Turbo 99 - 4/2 14:36:40
                              Oh yeah, whistleblowers being treated unfairly - Sal KC - 4/2 14:39:48
                                   Linda Tripp wasn't the whistle, er, blower(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/2 14:41:23
                                        lol (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:46:25
               She's probably part of deep state(nm) - playhard KC - 4/2 14:30:42
                    The deepest(nm) - Mormad MU - 4/2 14:31:01
               lmfao (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:30:33
                    RE: lmfao (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:38:15
     How do you know Obama or Clinton - Sal KC - 4/2 14:25:34
          The unbiased media would have checked for these things - Floyd Turbo 99 - 4/2 14:28:00
               Does the media have access to WH background check info?(nm) - playhard KC - 4/2 14:30:18
                    They managed to get this accusation so it seems reasonable - Floyd Turbo 99 - 4/2 14:31:58
                         Don't throw logic into this (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:32:22
                    what a weird defense (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:30:48
                         A whistleblower is why this is a story is it not?(nm) - playhard KC - 4/2 14:32:49
                              You're right, there have never been leaks (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:33:24
                                   Lol, or just maybe - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:35:59
                                        That has nothing to do with how the media - Sal KC - 4/2 14:37:41
                                             lol, jfc(nm) - playhard KC - 4/2 14:39:07
                                             If there are leakers now - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:38:46
                                                  I'm not sure how this is going over your head - Sal KC - 4/2 14:40:51
                                                  No, it's a conspiracy by the media...everyone is out to get - playhard KC - 4/2 14:39:54
                                                       You are the only one mentioning a conspiracy (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:41:03
                                                            RE: You are the only one mentioning a conspiracy (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:41:11
                                                                 That isn't a conspiracy (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:43:08
                                                                      You're getting to be as paranoid as trump is(nm) - playhard KC - 4/2 14:48:24
                                                                           What am I paranoid about? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:50:41
                                   So you're saying this is a conspiracy by the media now? - playhard KC - 4/2 14:35:10
                                        I didn't say anything about a conspiracy - Sal KC - 4/2 14:35:55
                                             So the media sat on info about dozens of security clearances - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:39:50
                                                  Not covering a President negatively isn't a conspiracy (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:41:40
                                             lol, jfc(nm) - playhard KC - 4/2 14:38:20
               That's exactly what I'm waiting for rask to say (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:28:47
                    RE: That's exactly what I'm waiting for rask to say (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:31:29
                         who served in the Obama administration said - MizzouTigerz MU - 4/2 14:42:00
                         Why weren't you upset about Ben Rhodes? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:32:07
                              RE: Why weren't you upset about Ben Rhodes? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:33:11
                                   and? (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:34:01
                                        And the Obama admin took the FBI recommendations - MrBlueSky MU - 4/2 14:41:58
                                             Are you willfully ignorant or just dumb? - Sal KC - 4/2 14:45:11
          RE: How do you know Obama or Clinton - scan MU - 4/2 14:27:07
               Yep (nm) - Sal KC - 4/2 14:27:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard