conversations with "civil society and academics" who were experts on race relations and decided to no longer allow white separatists on Facebook.
Because of their conversations with civil society and academics. I don't think there is much overlap in those two categories.
The article doesn't say if they have a position against black racism, black separatism, muzz/sharia advocacy, LULAC or LaRaza, the communist party or any anti american groups.
But they will stand against racism.
Because they had conversations with civil society and academics.
Facebook didn't know what to think about racism until they had conversations with civil society and academics.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/facebook-bans-white-nationalism-separatism-171947650.htmlEdited by hokie at 16:24:10 on 03/27/19