Welcome Guest

After two years of literally zero oversight by the House

Posted on: March 5, 2019 at 15:26:25 CT

MrBlueSky MU

Posts:

48578

Member For:

20.37 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

it is very significant that the House is again returning to its constitutional duty.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

lol Drumpf fires off first GFY to House over Presidential - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 3/5 14:28:04

LOL Who isn't investigating him... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 3/5 17:36:20

It's trump, they expected that. It'll end up in court after - Toger STL - 3/5 15:49:19

RE: It's trump, they expected that. It'll end up in court after - None**** MU - 3/5 18:15:01

lol "it's Trump" - Sal KC - 3/5 15:52:23

yeah but that was different(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 3/5 16:02:08

Hopefully it will last longer now.(nm) - Toger STL - 3/5 15:53:32

Dear Fat Jerry, - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/5 14:30:43

good (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 14:29:03

Why is that good?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 3/5 15:40:32

b/c they are telling the dems to take their baseless - Sal KC - 3/5 15:43:24

How do you know it's baseless?(nm) - playhard KC - 3/5 15:45:51

If they had evidence of specific crimes - Sal KC - 3/5 15:47:30

I'm struggling to understand why you want oversight for one - playhard KC - 3/5 15:59:19

We aren't talking about oversight - Sal KC - 3/5 16:02:27

RE: good (nm) - playhard KC - 3/5 15:17:46

lol what the House is doing isn't oversight - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 3/5 15:22:20

Presidential harassment is a funny term - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:23:28

The dems in congress are literally bragging about - Sal KC - 3/5 15:24:50

After two years of literally zero oversight by the House - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:26:25

keep supporting the police state (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 15:26:55

Lol, you're so pathetic - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:28:05

You are literally advocating for investigations without - Sal KC - 3/5 15:32:58

That isn't oversight (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 15:18:49

RE: That isn't oversight (nm) - playhard KC - 3/5 15:23:47

Lol, subverting the security clearance process to get - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:22:28

If the President has the final say on the process - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 3/5 15:27:28

RE: If the President has the final say on the process - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:27:44

Yes you are correct for once - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 3/5 15:33:17

The President has the final say (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 15:32:39

That is just another accusation - Sal KC - 3/5 15:23:55

RE: That is just another accusation - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:25:21

I'm aware of the accusations (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 15:26:39

So WH counsel believed Kushner should NOT get - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 15:27:18

Is that what the WH counsel actually said? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 15:32:20

Yes - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 16:23:27

You misread what I asked - Sal KC - 3/5 20:06:07

Sal is just being partisan as usual(nm) - playhard KC - 3/5 15:26:15

You and blue can't handle simple concepts, per usual - Sal KC - 3/5 15:33:37

Sal, i get the concept - playhard KC - 3/5 15:44:38

No, you don't get it at all (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 15:46:13