Welcome Guest

It’s legalese-forgot more affirmatively states a lack of any

Posted on: February 21, 2019 at 15:40:30 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
21.47 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
knowledge, not recalling something implies that you may or may not have ever known anything, but as you sit there, you are unable to call forth a specific recollection. You may know, you just don’t remember at the moment. Not recalling something presently allows for later recollection. Semantics yes, but in the legal world that can be important

Edited by Mo Texan at 15:42:00 on 02/21/19
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

          Of course he does---he is a liar like Comey - mu7176grad MU - 2/21 15:01:08
          Agree, that’s why he said can’t recall-legalese, he knows (nm) - Mo Texan MU - 2/21 14:54:10
     Well, there's been some major turnover - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/21 14:48:44
     Had he said forgot I’d call BS. Can’t recall not so much - Mo Texan MU - 2/21 14:40:10
          He essentially said exactly that...(saying he would have to - Spanky KU - 2/21 14:52:10
               Your post says can’t recall-just going by that(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 2/21 14:58:25
                    How is that different than ‘forgot’? - Spanky KU - 2/21 15:02:53
                         Wait until you're older. You'll know then.(nm) - Toger STL - 2/21 15:44:35
                              I am older than McCabe - Spanky KU - 2/21 15:55:15
                                   I don't doubt he remembers but avoided answering - Toger STL - 2/21 16:04:22
                                        'I can't recall without my notes' is the same as - Spanky KU - 2/21 16:12:40
                                             You can believe what you want if it fits into your box. - Toger STL - 2/21 16:19:57
                                                  Do you think he was lying when he said 'I don't recall'? - Spanky KU - 2/21 16:22:33
                                                       I don't have vision into his mind like you seem to. - Toger STL - 2/21 16:29:15
                                                            he didn't dodge.. he lied. - Spanky KU - 2/21 17:24:24
                                                       OK lets go with he knew-why should he tell a reporter?(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 2/21 16:27:27
                                                            Why lie (again)? - Spanky KU - 2/21 17:23:57
                         It’s legalese-forgot more affirmatively states a lack of any - Mo Texan MU - 2/21 15:40:30
     They were concerned about the guy and had a quick talk - raskolnikov MU - 2/21 14:38:38
          he said Rosenstein told him the names of 2 CABINET MEMBERS - Spanky KU - 2/21 15:00:59
               I listened to several interviews w/him. He did not say that - raskolnikov MU - 2/21 15:32:21
                    Read the article in the OP. Perhaps the reporter wasnt - Spanky KU - 2/21 21:10:12
          RE: They were concerned about the guy and had a quick talk - MOCO SON MU - 2/21 14:50:59
               Moc0 - it is the JOB of these men to sense such concerns - raskolnikov MU - 2/21 15:35:30
                    RE: Moc0 - it is the JOB of these men to sense such concerns - MOCO SON MU - 2/21 15:51:21
                         No - raskolnikov MU - 2/21 15:57:44
          They all stink to high heaven---step forward if a "patriot" - mu7176grad MU - 2/21 14:48:33
          lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/21 14:48:19
     His book name tells me he is guilty.nm - yy4u MU - 2/21 14:37:43




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard