Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

RE: It's not a fact you embecile(nm)

Posted on: February 15, 2019 at 12:00:29 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44901

Member For:

13.32 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

FY 2019 - $3.422 trillion, estimated.
FY 2018 - $3.34 trillion, estimated.
FY 2017 - $3.32 trillion.
FY 2016 - $3.27 trillion.
FY 2015 - $3.25 trillion.
FY 2014 - $3.02 trillion.
FY 2013 - $2.77 trillion.
FY 2012 - $2.45 trillion.
FY 2011 - $2.30 trillion.
FY 2010 - $2.16 trillion.
FY 2009 - $2.10 trillion.
FY 2008 - $2.52 trillion.
FY 2007 - $2.57 trillion.
FY 2006 - $2.4 trillion.
FY 2005 - $2.15 trillion.
FY 2004 - $1.88 trillion.
FY 2003 - $1.72 trillion.
FY 2002 - $1.85 trillion.
FY 2001 - $1.99 trillion.
FY 2000 - $2.03 trillion.

https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-tax-revenue-3305762

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

It's almost like they lied about their awesome tax cut - TheShoe STL - 2/15 11:43:20

It's a spending issue (nm) - Sal KC - 2/15 13:59:32

JFC you are stupid. (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/15 12:08:02

when is the tea party protest?? - ivan drago MU - 2/15 12:04:42

there's a tea party? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:11:11

record.high.receipts - it's always a spending problem - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:53:40

Thank God the wall will be built and tariffs continued. - Badird MU - 2/15 11:57:19

straw (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:59:15

Spending is a straw? LOOOOL (nm) - Badird MU - 2/15 12:01:04

here it is for you again without link - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:04:01

did you read the post of mine above yours? - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:03:32

You have trouble reading. - Badird MU - 2/15 12:06:39

Let me be clear for you: - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:08:20

Its your stance, sport. - Badird MU - 2/15 12:10:40

no, it's you saying it's my stance - which is a straw - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:11:35

lol you have defended the wall countless times knowing full - Badird MU - 2/15 12:12:22

more straw - here is my stance - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:14:50

Here is your stance: - Badird MU - 2/15 12:21:44

you want border security too, right? so what's - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:26:55

Id suggest that hiring more agents and building a wall are - Badird MU - 2/15 12:30:05

so more spending? lmfao (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:31:55

Here is Spanky's post on it. - Badird MU - 2/15 12:35:33

No, I was pretty clear that reworking current spending - Badird MU - 2/15 12:33:30

His stance is - meatiger MU - 2/15 12:18:10

Yup, pretty much this. (nm) - Badird MU - 2/15 12:21:51

can i get a link to my supporting anything about this wall - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:21:51

RE: can i get a link to my supporting anything about this wall - meatiger MU - 2/15 12:25:42

Here is Spanky's post on it. - Badird MU - 2/15 12:34:58

I posted this in the wrong spot. nm - Badird MU - 2/15 12:36:02

so...are you back to not wanting border security again? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:28:18

Oh, so you are FOR the wall, just not the FUNDING of it? - Badird MU - 2/15 12:25:08

what "Wall" am I for? I'm for border security, aren't you? - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:26:04

Follow my post above where I outlined 3 posts of yours - Badird MU - 2/15 12:31:46

just different spending - - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:33:10

No. (nm) - Badird MU - 2/15 12:33:40

Is real revenue per taxpayer up? How about real expenses - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:55:08

per taxpayer? lol - did your simple equation just become - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:56:30

There are record high tax receipts right now. * - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:51:43

Yes, because there are more taxpayers. There also are more - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:54:00

So, it's a spending problem. - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:55:14

Expenses are increasing faster than revenue. There are two - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:57:53

So, it's a spending problem. - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:01:03

Tax receipts HAVE been cut. Receipts would certainly have - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 12:42:29

At least, you now admit that revenue has increased - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:54:53

👏deficits👏dont👏rise👏because👏of👏tax👏cuts - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/15 11:48:26

Mnuchin - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 2/15 11:54:16

Income = Revenues minus Expenses - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:51:34

Yes, and most grasp that expenses should be cut drastically. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/15 12:12:07

revenue increased (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:54:11

The **** it has(nm) - TheShoe STL - 2/15 11:57:10

RE: The **** it has(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:00:58

RE: The **** it has(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:58:04

Individual returns up slightly, Corp down damn near 30% - TheShoe STL - 2/15 12:01:11

Nominal vs real value of tax dollars shouldn't be at issue - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:11:43

corp tax rate increases are a lot like tariffs, Shoe, - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:09:30

and - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:05:31

so now you're changing you position to components of - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:04:36

I didn't change anything - TheShoe STL - 2/15 12:28:56

So did expenses. More people, more expenses. Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:55:47

and that's why we need a wall, to keep more out. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/15 12:13:07

lol so it's a spending issue right dumba$$? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/15 11:57:44

Expenses are increasing faster than revenue. There are two - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:58:42

lol keep diggin idiot(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/15 12:06:05

Again, you're pinpointing the spending problem - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:03:40

right - expenses. the real problem. good work, Sherlock - - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:57:18

So, it's a spending problem (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:57:03

RE: Income = Revenues minus Expenses - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:53:54

Revenue hasn't decreased (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:52:51

sweet jesus you ****ing morons get on the damn boat(nm) - TheShoe STL - 2/15 11:54:31

That simple fact blows a hole right into your OP (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:57:38

It's not a fact you embecile(nm) - TheShoe STL - 2/15 11:59:08

RE: It's not a fact you embecile(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 12:00:43

RE: It's not a fact you embecile(nm) - ummmm MU - 2/15 12:00:29

RE: It's not a fact you embecile(nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/15 11:59:40

that is pretty stupid - TheShoe STL - 2/15 11:49:07

RE: that is pretty stupid - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 11:49:46

lol poor Shoe(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/15 11:49:43

Gee, when you reduce revenue the deficit goes up. Who knew, - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:47:14

how does revenue get reduced when it's at record levels? - dangertim MU

- 2/15 12:55:35

You posted in this thread yesterday: - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:49:30

Yes, I did. Relevance? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 2/15 11:52:40

RE: Yes, I did. Relevance? Nm - MOCO SON MU - 2/15 11:56:33

It's an article about how income tax revenue has not - ummmm MU - 2/15 11:53:45

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard