Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Here you go.

Posted on: February 11, 2019 at 15:20:27 CT
TigerMatt STL
Posts:
96581
Member For:
26.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
You dismiss property rights defense solely because "no harm to property was done". Apparently you don't feel property owners have a right to say get the fvck off my land.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=16050039

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15975703
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Inasmuch as 90 is an abject coward and his personal idiot is - hokie VT - 2/11 14:55:02
     You really are too stupid for words (nm) - pickle MU - 2/11 15:50:04
          Ho is one of the most - mizzoumurfkc KC - 2/11 16:41:20
     damn You’re dumb(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 2/11 15:39:13
     it is entirely beyond your capabilities - pickle MU - 2/11 15:06:55
          Whew. That was close. Nice dodge! - Emoji Man MSU - 2/11 15:19:15
     this sentence - the premise of your post - is utter hogwash - 90Tiger MU - 2/11 14:59:07
          Answer the scenario (nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 2/11 17:47:01
          So princess, the hell's angels scenario. Your reply....? - hokie VT - 2/11 14:59:53
               the same as i replied the first fvcking time - 90Tiger MU - 2/11 15:03:00
                    Neither of you really understand what infringement means - JG A - 2/11 15:07:39
                         1. I don't - 90Tiger MU - 2/11 15:11:14
                              1 yes thats exactly what it means - JG A - 2/11 15:13:52
                                   no, it isn't what it means, and you didn't address the - 90Tiger MU - 2/11 15:17:15
                                        Yes it does and - JG A - 2/11 15:20:12
                                             You're allowing the coward to duck the question. Like you - hokie VT - 2/11 15:22:42
                                                  Ducking the question is about - JG A - 2/11 15:25:16
                                        You are more comfortable talking with JG on this change of - hokie VT - 2/11 15:19:52
                                             LOL he doesn't even come close - JG A - 2/11 15:21:24
                                                  Hey JG, shut up. Or say something new. nm - hokie VT - 2/11 15:25:52
                                                       Come up with something new - JG A - 2/11 15:28:09
                              My my, getting nasty. But still too cowardly to answer the - hokie VT - 2/11 15:13:47
                         Thanx. Someone can explain that to me later. What do YOU - hokie VT - 2/11 15:10:38
                              They work great in the Halls of Shambyla - JG A - 2/11 15:12:46
                         JFC.. from the guy who supports government violating - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 15:09:39
                              JG has taken a noticeable turn - pickle MU - 2/11 15:11:44
                                   ummmmm - JG A - 2/11 15:14:30
                              Could you provide a link for THAT - JG A - 2/11 15:10:47
                                   There is no point with you. You'll just lie and deny it - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 15:13:46
                                        JG never lies. He told us. He said he lies in other - hokie VT - 2/11 15:16:17
                                             If anyone could ever find a lie from me - JG A - 2/11 15:19:23
                                                  Shut up. nm - hokie VT - 2/11 15:20:53
                                        It is the same old story - JG A - 2/11 15:15:50
                                             Here you go. - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 15:20:27
                                                  The property rights being infringed - JG A - 2/11 15:23:56
                                                       Wrong. Property rights fundamentally include who you - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 15:27:15
                                                            Property owners have a right to access their property - JG A - 2/11 15:30:45
                                                                 Wrong. They wanted to use her property to access the land - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 15:40:17
                                                                      Her property surrounded the government property - JG A - 2/11 15:52:33
                                                                           For the government to use a helicopter. She had no real say - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 16:05:12
                                                                                So no solution then - JG A - 2/11 16:08:44
                                                                                     One does not violate her property rights, the other does. - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 16:11:52
                                                                                          So no solution then - JG A - 2/11 16:23:39
                                                                                               You are hokie stupid.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 16:25:28
                                                                                                    irony - JG A - 2/11 16:39:01
                    So your answer to the hell's angel scenario is what, - hokie VT - 2/11 15:05:35
                         I'm unable to converse with you. - 90Tiger MU - 2/11 15:13:39
                              You're not unable, you're unwilling. And too cowardly. nm - hokie VT - 2/11 15:18:03
                                   The irony is thick on both of your sides - JG A - 2/11 15:38:03




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard