Ever notice how discussions on this board end when libs

Posted on: January 21, 2019 at 09:43:19 CT

are presented with facts? Or even with reasonable questions that they choose not to answer.

Two examples today.

1. The raskol was whining about something, and I gave seven examples of media cheating, lying and hypocrisy. The discussion ended.

2. Ariola talked about apologies being virtually the same as participation trophies. He was asked by multiple posters whether apologies are deserved when wrongdoing is committed. End of discussion.

In neither case could the pathetic liberal offer a defense of his position, or a substantive argument to defeat the other.

This leads to one of two conclusions in my mind.

One. Liberals are ill informed and spew emotional testimony about what the WANT TO BE true. When shown their error, being cowardly and hypocritical, they cannot admit they were wrong.

Two. They were lying all along. Their lies were intentional and offered with malice. But they got busted.

So, like the socialists and the liberal press corpse, when one lie is exposed, they just move on to the next one. Ignoring their own shameful deceit and its exposure.