Welcome Guest

RE: Retaliatory Tariffs change behavior

Posted on: January 9, 2019 at 10:46:51 CT

meatiger MU

Posts:

133229

Member For:

26.47 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

I don’t disagree. But in my opinion it was not necessary. Trade has opened up and tariffs have gone down over the last 50 years without bouts of retaliatory trades

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

China pledges to buy 'substantial amount' of U.S. goods - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:16:13

China wasn't buying a "substantial amount" of US goods - tigerdb MU - 1/9 10:28:03

No - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:29:52

LOL...you don't believe there will be a trade deficit with - tigerdb MU - 1/9 10:53:38

It will be much lower if a deal is reached - Spanky KU - 1/9 11:41:00

Well, then we definitely don't want to hurt that - ummmm MU - 1/9 10:34:42

RE: China pledges to buy 'substantial amount' of U.S. goods - meatiger MU - 1/9 10:23:47

Retaliatory Tariffs change behavior - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:27:03

RE: Retaliatory Tariffs change behavior - meatiger MU - 1/9 10:46:51

of producers and consumers, yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/9 10:27:29

Lather, rinse, repeat - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:29:23

RE: Lather, rinse, repeat - ummmm MU - 1/9 10:30:10

Apple does not pay taxes in the US for product made - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:40:56

That is actually not true. What you describe is a - tman MU - 1/9 10:55:13

That is 100% true. Money earned overseas by product - Spanky KU - 1/9 11:40:22

Good, they shouldn't - ummmm MU - 1/9 10:41:30

And you bought their excuse hook line and sinker(nm) - tman MU - 1/9 10:39:04

No, I was just pointing out how Spanky didn't read to - ummmm MU - 1/9 10:40:59

Nope... you were just assuming I gave a f*ck about - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:43:33

You clearly do give a f*ck - ummmm MU - 1/9 10:45:06

Nope. You seem to be the one who is crying over Apple - Spanky KU - 1/9 10:51:23