Welcome Guest

Acosta was infringing on the other reporters 1st Amendment

Posted on: November 15, 2018 at 13:36:40 CT

DoltfromSTL MU

Posts:

11075

Member For:

7.56 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Rights by refusing to stop at the customary one question and one follow-up and refusing to pass the mic. It was all about himself.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Removing a belligerent reporter is not a First Amendment - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/15 13:30:55

LOOK !! - raskolnikov MU - 11/15 14:36:39

RE: LOOK !! - MOCO SON MU - 11/15 15:17:50

RE: Removing a belligerent reporter is not a First Amendment - playhard NWMSU - 11/15 13:37:31

Agreed, then why the need for a false story to remove - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:37:22

cool you have definitive proof - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:44:08

Acosta was a chronic offender... - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:40:20

then why the need for a false story? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 11/15 13:43:58

Why do you feel compelled to defend this a**hole?(nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:51:18

RE: Why do you feel compelled to defend this a**hole?(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:52:44

what's false? - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:44:27

The WH said his credentials were removed because - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:46:20

Both. But either alone is enough(nm) - tman MU - 11/15 13:52:04

those aren't mutually exclusive - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:47:23

Clearly the line of "he put his hands on" the intern - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:15:14

no, they just have a better argument (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 14:19:22

Grandstanding is a better argument - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:21:38

In this case, of course. It's a "1st amendment" case - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 14:59:32

He's not bright (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 13:57:48

Lol, you're an idiot - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:30:13

RE: what's false? - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 11/15 13:45:22

Your defense of this a**hole speaks volumes about you (nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:50:14

Donno that many people are defending Acosta's actions - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 14:34:32

that something isn't being argued - FootballRefugee MU

- 11/15 13:46:23

no reporter should question the surpreme commander - playhard NWMSU - 11/15 13:43:41

Acosta was infringing on the other reporters 1st Amendment - DoltfromSTL MU - 11/15 13:36:40

I thought he assaulted the - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:38:07

The Deputy AG representing the Trump admin in the - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:39:18

not really an argument that is needed - Sal KC - 11/15 13:43:26

So Sarah just lied again... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:51:51

No (nm) - Sal KC - 11/15 13:57:52

Nope. Just not needed for the case(nm) - tman MU - 11/15 13:53:38

Just lied and - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:55:56

If it was doctored there would be more on it. - tman MU - 11/15 14:16:43

WUT??? - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:40:04

Trump didn't have to call on him. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 11/15 13:37:36

Trump wanted the conflict and when Acosta pushed back - playhard NWMSU - 11/15 13:41:24

Acosta is not a victim - Sal KC - 11/15 13:50:19

Neither was anyone else, Sal - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:56:45

Cool, I didn't say anybody else was (nm) - Sal KC - 11/15 13:58:12

So why is Trump playing the victim, - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 14:02:46

I have no idea - Sal KC - 11/15 14:03:57

Or go back to him after his initial comment... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 11/15 13:39:01