Welcome Guest

sure, there's no burden of proof

Posted on: September 28, 2018 at 08:26:17 CT
o'lineydisciple MU
Posts:
6660
Member For:
25.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
but anyone with any sort of logic whatsoever recognizes this is *at best* a questionable claim and *most likely* a complete falsehood, given that the accuser didn't know where, when the alleged incident occurred, and nobody else she claims were there back up her claim.

as kavanaugh stated, she very well may have been sexually assaulted. But the idea that there's any proof or any evidence other than her own shaky memory that kavanaugh was the one who did it has already left the station.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     there's no burden of proof in a senate hearing - gmmm98 MU - 9/28 07:31:57
          sure, there's no burden of proof - o'lineydisciple MU - 9/28 08:26:17
          Actually the burden of proof is on Kavanaugh in this case - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:41:11
     Judge (Mark) needs to appear. - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:08:21
          There is no evidence for him to refute - 615Tiger STL - 9/28 07:20:26
               Question for you - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 07:26:39
                    You are not a wise man - 615Tiger STL - 9/28 07:33:08
                    Judge's book was fiction, you STOOPID dumbfvck (nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:28:23
                         No dum bass...Judge's books are his memoirs. - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:37:04
                    He's an alcoholic cancer survivor. You want to ruin his life - hefeweizen MU - 9/28 07:28:04
                         You don't think it's important to know the truth? It - playhard NWMSU - 9/28 07:34:29
                              Fatty has no interest in the truth(nm) - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:37:30
          Several things he clears up - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 07:15:23
               My gawd, Man...Are you really this STOOPID? - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:17:19
                    Nice substance(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 07:22:39
                         EXACTLY! - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:23:34
          No he doesn't. He will say it didn't happen. Your crazy - hefeweizen MU - 9/28 07:10:00
               How do you know what he will say?(nm) - playhard NWMSU - 9/28 07:21:40
               "Brenda"...is fatty trying to make a funny?(nm) - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:13:33
          What about Ford's lifelong friend? - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:09:48
               She wasn't in the room, and she never said that it didn't - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:13:08
                    Neither was Mark Judge (nm) - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:17:50
                    She said she wasn't at any such party, didn't know BK... - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:16:04
                         No - her attorney stated that she "did not recall" - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:20:13
                              Her attorney repeated her testimony and statement... - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:27:20
                                   "did not recall" is not the same as "did not happen"... - tigerdb MU - 9/28 07:29:11
     That hearing wasn't designed to show proof of - SparkyStalcup MU - 9/28 07:07:17
          Time to dust off your pussy hat, Sheila, and head on over - hefeweizen MU - 9/28 07:08:29
     Two perps and their political backers oppose inquiry - raskolnikov MU - 9/28 07:06:19
          So you finally admit Ford has no evidence and could not... - DoltfromSTL MU - 9/28 07:11:12
          Just a disingenuous delay tactic, admitted to by your - hefeweizen MU - 9/28 07:07:42
     So do you think that’s why the American Bar Association - playhard NWMSU - 9/28 07:02:17
          No, they are calling for one bc their party bosses called fo - hefeweizen MU - 9/28 07:06:48




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard