sure, there's no burden of proof
Posted on: September 28, 2018 at 08:26:17 CT
o'lineydisciple MU
Posts:
6660
Member For:
25.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
but anyone with any sort of logic whatsoever recognizes this is *at best* a questionable claim and *most likely* a complete falsehood, given that the accuser didn't know where, when the alleged incident occurred, and nobody else she claims were there back up her claim.
as kavanaugh stated, she very well may have been sexually assaulted. But the idea that there's any proof or any evidence other than her own shaky memory that kavanaugh was the one who did it has already left the station.