Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: How is Kavanaugh supposed to ‘prove’ he didn’t attend a

Posted on: September 22, 2018 at 18:05:21 CT
MOCO SON MU
Posts:
29629
Member For:
8.61 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
He can't because the progressive liberal "gobalist" Dems with the assistance of their MSM have managed in implant this concept that "it is the seriousness of the charge" is all that is important. We are seeing our United States system of justice changed by media fiat!
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Gadfly demonstrates jiust below the problem for the left - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 9/22 17:20:02
     They are asking for more witnesses - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:23:17
          There is only one witness & she’s a liar(nm) - MU98 STL - 9/22 20:55:44
     only an objective FBI investigation - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:13:58
          What is an "objective" FBI investigation? nm. - MUTGR MU - 9/22 20:09:38
               Most all of them - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 20:46:17
          Lol, like when they investigated Hillary - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:08:06
               why didn't Trey Gowdy's 2.5 year investigation - Gadfly MU - 9/22 19:17:51
                    Why were emails deleted, computers wiped with - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:22:06
                         that isn't possible - Gadfly MU - 9/22 19:29:14
                              What’s not possible? (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:31:44
          You've at least 3 different people explain why they won't. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:19:37
               the White House needs to ask for it - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:30:00
                    That's utter bullshyte. Innocent until proven guilty. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:39:51
                         THAT only applies in a court of law bud(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:42:32
                              Idiot, Due Process still applies. Have someone educated - MU98 STL - 9/22 20:57:26
                              So, you seek a new standard for nominees? - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:48:12
                                   Not at all - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:00:58
                                        Hmm, that's why grassley's doing yet ford won't show. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 19:19:34
                         nobody is prosecuting him for a crime - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:41:57
               What is not legally possible ?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:24:14
                    Go read the posts below, I'm not wasting more time on it. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:30:22
                         Just say it - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:37:51
                              FBI doesn't have any jurisdiction on this matter. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:43:30
                                   Dipweed, they do background inquiries ALL the time - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:17:58
                                        I've actually held top secret clearance, have you? - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 19:23:45
                                             You realize how stupid what you are saying is? - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:30:15
                                                  I have a hard time lowering myself to your level. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 21:34:06
                         The more Gadfly asks - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 9/22 18:31:46
                              the posts here defending kavanaugh are the most emotional - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:34:24
                         it is legally possible - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:31:33
          Its not even something the FBI SHOULD - JG A - 9/22 18:17:20
               They do it all the time(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:24:55
                    If so, please provide a few examples. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:30:57
                         Anita Hill BANG - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:36:21
                              That's actually proved my point, you two idiots. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:50:02
                                   It was a character inquiry not a legal one - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 19:06:55
                                        Wrong again, like you are about everything you post. FBI - MU98 STL - 9/22 21:00:53
                              exactly - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:42:23
               why not? - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:17:50
                    It happened 36 years ago - JG A - 9/22 18:20:12
                         but the FBI does background checks - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:21:44
                              Since she is going to testify - JG A - 9/22 18:25:18
                                   it would establish the facts prior to testimony - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:31:00
                    The accusation is not a federal crime.(nm) - TigerMatt MU - 9/22 18:18:36
                         the FBI does background checks - Gadfly MU - 9/22 18:32:43
          RE: only an objective FBI investigation - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:15:27
     yet again - JG A - 9/22 17:42:36
          Forming a belief on evidence (or lack thereof) is bad? - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:09:08
               Not what I said, of course - JG A - 9/22 19:11:18
                    Like when you said Kavanaugh wasn’t being accused of - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 20:22:22
          lol - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:18:57
          Yes, she knows 100% what happened. Just not the year. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:11:18
          RE: yet again - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:02:36
               I haven't seen anyone say he - JG A - 9/22 18:10:46
                    RE: I haven't seen anyone say he - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:22:36
                         I would ask if you are that stupid - JG A - 9/22 18:30:28
                              nobody can ever know, jg, speculating one way or the - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:34:33
                    calling her a victim does that (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:21:05
                         Link it up - JG A - 9/22 18:21:35
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:27:00
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:25:32
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:24:25
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:23:44
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:23:07
                              RE: Link it up - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:22:49
                                   All of those are more about making accurate points - JG A - 9/22 18:28:18
                                        RE: All of those are more about making accurate points - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 19:48:50
                                             You partisan hacks really are droll - JG A - 9/22 19:56:51
                                        Lol, you’d be better served tucking your tail and going away - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:12:08
                                             Yeah school for the mentally handicapped - JG A - 9/22 19:14:17
                                                  Lol. Ok, Xenu. 👽👽👽 (nm) - MIZ45 MU - 9/22 19:17:53
                                                  yes, and drop you off (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 19:17:01
                                        yes, every time they call her a victim and treat BK as - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:30:10
                                             Its a manner of speech - JG A - 9/22 18:32:10
                                                  take this back, liar - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:37:43
                                                       well OK Spanky lied about a fake person - JG A - 9/22 18:38:51
                                                  no, JG, it's a rhetorical device used to imply his guilt and - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 18:37:01
                                                       You have no understanding of what the word - JG A - 9/22 18:39:39
                                                            There's no case, no arrest, no charge, hence, no evidence. - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 19:16:33
                                                                 If it was a criminal charge - JG A - 9/22 19:22:05
                                                                      there is no "evidence" here of anything. nothing. zero. Non - 90Tiger MU - 9/22 19:46:12
                                                                           LOl I spelled it out for you and still - JG A - 9/22 19:47:51
          How is Kavanaugh supposed to ‘prove’ he didn’t attend a - Spanky KU - 9/22 17:47:44
               RE: How is Kavanaugh supposed to ‘prove’ he didn’t attend a - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:05:21
                    ROFLMFAO - "progressive liberal globalist . . . "(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/22 18:26:48
                    He's not on trial for a crime - JG A - 9/22 18:09:52
               No one is accusing me of it - JG A - 9/22 17:48:49
                    Only because animals can't talk. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:13:02
                    One of my coworkers said she was in Vegas sometime in - Spanky KU - 9/22 18:11:00
                         well as usual you are lying - JG A - 9/22 18:14:45
                              Prove it - Spanky KU - 9/22 18:20:25
                                   Present your alleged coworker - JG A - 9/22 18:21:12
                                        present your defense first - Spanky KU - 9/22 20:01:48
                                             I didn't do it I wasn't there - JG A - 9/22 22:04:09
                                                  Prove you weren’t at the unnamed place at the unnamed time - Spanky KU - 9/22 22:11:15
                                                       If you weren't lying - JG A - 9/22 22:47:44
                              RE: well as usual you are lying - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 18:16:31
                                   Yeah how utterly unusual that a liar lied - JG A - 9/22 18:17:53
                    Damn, you're stupid. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:53:49
                         a false one - JG A - 9/22 17:54:53
                              It was a perfect analogy. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 18:02:23
                                   Perfectly false - JG A - 9/22 18:09:05
          If there is no proof either way, then what is the reason - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:44:46
               And there is the principle of innocence until guilt is - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:48:43
                    I'm not assuming, unlike you I'm looking at - JG A - 9/22 17:52:59
                         You aren't looking at any evidence. You're just fantasizing - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:56:47
                              LOL such Wycoiny - JG A - 9/22 17:58:16
                         The only thing offered which meets the criteria for what is - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:56:29
                              Yeah and? - JG A - 9/22 17:59:19
                                   And you have offered nothing as evidence of guilt. - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 18:01:51
                                        I'm sorry you don't understand how reality works - JG A - 9/22 18:13:24
                                             One thing is certainly true. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 18:40:18
                                                  LOL - JG A - 9/22 19:12:26
                                                       Actually, that's you. - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 22:10:38
               The preponderance of the evidence - JG A - 9/22 17:48:09
                    False. There cannot be a preponderance of evidence he is - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:52:32
                         yes there can - JG A - 9/22 17:54:30
                              RE: yes there can - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 18:26:17
                                   RE: yes there can - JG A - 9/22 18:36:08
                              You think he is lying is not proof. We don't determine the - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:58:45
                                   The evidence is thus - JG A - 9/22 18:06:40
                                        cool word dude nm - redngray MU - 9/23 19:46:31
                                        so, in your evidence you show that you're biased against him - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:14:37
                                             how so? - JG A - 9/22 18:15:30
                                                  that's even dumber than your last claim. congrats. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/22 18:17:44
                                                       My only bias is that he is unfit to sit on the Supreme Cour - JG A - 9/22 18:23:27
                    There is no "preponderance of the evidence." - Alferd Packer MU - 9/22 17:51:21
     RE: Gadfly demonstrates jiust below the problem for the left - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 17:36:55
     RE: Gadfly demonstrates jiust below the problem for the left - MOCO SON MU - 9/22 17:35:24




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard