 |
|
The charade is that with 6 years to prepare, she is claiming
Posted on: September 22, 2018 at 17:18:51 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
20.74 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
she needs more time to prepare.
She first said in 2012 she was concerned about him getting on the Supreme Court. (see husband's statement)
Turn over the letter, bring your evidence.
She could have gone to law enforcement any time in the last 6 years. She could have sent a letter sooner than after he was nominated. She could have notified the Court. She could have notified Congress. She could have gone to the media. Instead, she withheld everything, like a terrorist's bomb.
She can't remember.
She can't forget.
It was all the rage at her high school weeks,
but not one person spoke with her about it,
but how could that possibly have happened if it was such a heated discussion for weeks?
Nobody came up to her in school to talk about what the whole campus was buzzing about for weeks? Not her bff at school?
This bends the stick too far. It breaks.
She also said didn't talk to anyone about it until 2012, when she disclosed her purpose to keep him from getting on the Supreme Court.
So at the time she first mentions it, it is with the purpose of keeping the Judge off of the Supreme Court.
She, her attorney, and the liberals in Congress are having a trial of the accused by ambush, and they are trying to manipulate the process.
Why didn't she come forward to the F.B.I. when they were vetting the Judge? They spoke of the plan years and months ago.
The false witness said it absolutely occurred, only to retract her statement. This after she said in her initial accusation that she also would never want to have the Judge on the Supreme Court, the same as the friend for whom she lied.
That any objective person cannot see the huge problems with all of this it is just not believable.
The partisans will continue their denial because they don't care if it is true or not, so long as they can keep the Judge off of the Supreme Court.
This is pure politics.
If you accuse someone of a crime, you better come with proof. The only thing we have so far is lies.
She cannot both not remember, and can't forget. One or both of those things are not true.
If it didn't happen, then she neither remembers it, or can't remember it. You can only remember the false story you told.
If he did do it, she has ruined her credibility with her lies and political statements.
We know she is a liar. Her yearbook paints her as a drunken predator slut. And we are to accept her version of events?
No matter what happened, you can't trust what she has said. Nobody forced her to lie. She chose to do that. The responsibility for her not being a believable witness is her own. Instead of coming forward in a credible manner, she played politics.
Get on with it.
Edited by MizzouTigerz at 17:22:57 on 09/22/18
She first said in 2012 she was concerned about him getting on the Supreme Court. (see husband's statement)
Turn over the letter, bring your evidence.
She could have gone to law enforcement any time in the last 6 years. She could have sent a letter sooner than after he was nominated. She could have notified the Court. She could have notified Congress. She could have gone to the media. Instead, she withheld everything, like a terrorist's bomb.
She can't remember.
She can't forget.
It was all the rage at her high school weeks,
but not one person spoke with her about it,
but how could that possibly have happened if it was such a heated discussion for weeks?
Nobody came up to her in school to talk about what the whole campus was buzzing about for weeks? Not her bff at school?
This bends the stick too far. It breaks.
She also said didn't talk to anyone about it until 2012, when she disclosed her purpose to keep him from getting on the Supreme Court.
So at the time she first mentions it, it is with the purpose of keeping the Judge off of the Supreme Court.
She, her attorney, and the liberals in Congress are having a trial of the accused by ambush, and they are trying to manipulate the process.
Why didn't she come forward to the F.B.I. when they were vetting the Judge? They spoke of the plan years and months ago.
The false witness said it absolutely occurred, only to retract her statement. This after she said in her initial accusation that she also would never want to have the Judge on the Supreme Court, the same as the friend for whom she lied.
That any objective person cannot see the huge problems with all of this it is just not believable.
The partisans will continue their denial because they don't care if it is true or not, so long as they can keep the Judge off of the Supreme Court.
This is pure politics.
If you accuse someone of a crime, you better come with proof. The only thing we have so far is lies.
She cannot both not remember, and can't forget. One or both of those things are not true.
If it didn't happen, then she neither remembers it, or can't remember it. You can only remember the false story you told.
If he did do it, she has ruined her credibility with her lies and political statements.
We know she is a liar. Her yearbook paints her as a drunken predator slut. And we are to accept her version of events?
No matter what happened, you can't trust what she has said. Nobody forced her to lie. She chose to do that. The responsibility for her not being a believable witness is her own. Instead of coming forward in a credible manner, she played politics.
Get on with it.
Edited by MizzouTigerz at 17:22:57 on 09/22/18
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
The charade is that with 6 years to prepare, she is claiming - MizzouTigerz MU - 9/22 17:18:51