Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

WADR: Not enough facts to establish your premise

Posted on: September 11, 2018 at 11:57:34 CT
ScottsdaleTiger MU
Posts:
12769
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"engaged in discussions on torture" means . . .?

What was Kavanaugh's exact testimony to Congress?

And the "discussions" that you allege Kavanaugh lied about took place when, with whom and exactly what was said?

You're making a general assertion and you are not giving sufficient facts to allow a reasonable person to make a reasonable judgment as to what happened. And that's the first requirement.

Only after one has that knowledge can one address your question. I.e. did Kavanaugh participate fully in the discussions of what was allowable when questioning prisoners or did he have a conversation with a friend at at happy hour after either fits you factual description or something in between.

Sloppy and incomplete thinking strikes again.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

It is shown fact that Kavanaugh lied to the Senate in hearin - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:21:14
     I...don't....care.... - tigerfans3 MU - 9/11 12:02:20
     WADR: Not enough facts to establish your premise - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 9/11 11:57:34
     Lol u r more desperate than hrc (nm) - TigerFan92 MU - 9/11 11:45:40
     When each new claim or Kavanaugh perjury gets debunked - Sal KC - 9/11 11:40:29
     Nope! He was engaged on discussions about detainee access - Spanky KU - 9/11 11:37:37
     Imagine the shoe on the Democratic SC nominee foot... - Gyro MU - 9/11 11:35:33
          CONFIRMED - no one here is able to speak straight(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:47:20
          Yea we know dems stand up against perjury from Clinton’s era - El-ahrairah BAMA - 9/11 11:42:38
          Actually... the SC nominee would just be ignored - paleojas MU - 9/11 11:41:56
          Kavanaugh didn’t commit perjury (nm) - Sal KC - 9/11 11:40:55
          Blame your party for nominating Hillary.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/11 11:37:44
               Weekend at Bernie's(nm) - Gyro MU - 9/11 11:40:00
     You provide no evidence, or context yet demand we decide now - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/11 11:33:42
          Obviously he is not spotless dipweed, here you go - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:39:01
               THat's the same article, 3 times. Still spotless. - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/11 11:54:12
          No, Millions of documents are not available at the library. - catbirdseat MU - 9/11 11:35:00
               So is your claim he had to commit perjury - Sal KC - 9/11 11:43:04
               I'm sure that's what you want us all to think. I don't care - RHAYWORTH MU - 9/11 11:38:09
     So what? - El-ahrairah BAMA - 9/11 11:31:44
          Is the Senate a lifettime appt? Didn't think so(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:35:56
               But it is ok for the liars to confirm SC appointees.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 9/11 11:39:57
                    Seems to be the American way(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:45:13
                         so you're just being a full of **** partisan (nm) - pickle MU - 9/11 12:04:19
     You should go make a citizen's arrest and put him on - Floyd Turbo MU - 9/11 11:28:45
     is this another one of your made up claims?(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU - 9/11 11:28:23
          RE: is this another one of your made up claims?(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:44:23
     link? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 9/11 11:24:40
          RE: link? (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:45:33
               Thx (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 9/11 11:46:39
     Got a link for that or should we trust you on this? nm - hokie VT - 9/11 11:24:35
          RE: Got a link for that or should we trust you on this? nm - raskolnikov MU - 9/11 11:45:45
     could not care less (nm) - pickle MU - 9/11 11:22:28




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard