Welcome Guest

Probably correct but it could be done by the SC re-examining

Posted on: August 22, 2018 at 21:58:52 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
48370
Member For:
16.23 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the 14th amendment.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

They could rule that illegals that have snuck into the country illegally are NOT under the jurisdiction of the government and therefore their children would not be granted automatic citizenship.

I don’t know if the phrase “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” has ever been legally ruled upon. What exactly does it mean? How does it effect citizenship?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Can't all of those be worked into the general plan - tman MU - 11/15 11:42:15
     Hell, #4 or something similar would take care of most of it(nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/22 20:06:18
          Can’t do 4 without 2 & 3 - Spanky KU - 8/22 20:25:21
               You are on the right track. Penalties have to be personal. - DHighlander NWMSU - 8/22 21:50:30
     RE: Reform in 5 steps that wipes out illegal immigration - "Wild Bill" Donovan MU - 8/22 20:02:48
     No. - MizzouTigerz MU - 8/22 19:56:10
     it’s a one-step “solution” - pickle MU - 8/22 19:33:33
     You obsession with SSN is comical. They were never intended - Mo Texan MU - 8/22 18:59:37
          what's your plan? whine about enforcement of immigration - 90Tiger MU - 8/22 19:20:46
               Read what I’ve said in the threads below. That has - Mo Texan MU - 8/22 19:33:04
                    So what's your plan? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 8/22 20:37:52
                         As I said - Mo Texan MU - 8/22 20:56:16
                              so, what's your plan? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 8/22 21:57:47
                                   It’s below-I’ll check back tomorrow to see if you read it(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 8/22 22:52:36
     Works for me. - RHAYWORTH MU - 8/22 18:50:22
     I can do it in two steps - El-ahrairah BAMA - 8/22 18:44:36
          That fails miserably - Spanky KU - 8/22 18:49:22
          Actually very wrong on both, for very different reasons. - GA Tiger MU - 8/22 18:48:34
               so what? (nm) - pickle MU - 8/22 19:32:02
     Good job, if thats yours. No. 1 is incredibly - GA Tiger MU - 8/22 18:42:37
          #1 would require a constitutional amendment I believe - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/22 20:07:48
               Probably correct but it could be done by the SC re-examining - DHighlander NWMSU - 8/22 21:58:52
          All mine - Spanky KU - 8/22 18:49:02




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard