Welcome Guest

Fair point. But what if providing $100,000 for hookers saved

Posted on: August 21, 2018 at 08:11:39 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67482
Member For:
9.52 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
$1 million of security related expenses? Will the taxpayers be better off?

And I appreciate the moral argument here.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Probably no feasible solution to this. Even I - GA Tiger MU - 8/21 08:16:10
     Does the govt. pay the prostitution bill? (nm) - ummmm MU - 8/21 08:02:02
          Yes, that’s what requires a cost/benefit - hokie VT - 8/21 08:05:32
               keep your hands out of my pockets (nm) - pickle MU - 8/21 08:43:51
               Then no. I don't support taxpayer money going to - ummmm MU - 8/21 08:08:47
                    Fair point. But what if providing $100,000 for hookers saved - hokie VT - 8/21 08:11:39
                         Of course if you argue in the direction of saving money - GA Tiger MU - 8/21 08:21:12
                              how would one qualify for this "free" birth control? (nm) - pickle MU - 8/21 08:49:40
                         If it's strictly about money - ummmm MU - 8/21 08:20:45
                              Your mentor would be proud. Why not do away - hokie VT - 8/21 08:43:45
                                   You're an idiot, hokie (nm) - pickle MU - 8/21 08:44:33
                         And prisons could have, “Bring your skank to work day.” Nm - hokie VT - 8/21 08:14:23




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard