For their employee's safety? Yes. That batsh*t crazy
Posted on: July 6, 2018 at 09:20:50 CT
Tigrrrr!
MU
Posts:
252021
Member For:
22.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
bastard was a documented threat to them and many employees feared for their safety and yet the paper refused to do anything.
No armed security.
No pinch point for controlled access.
No injunction requiring the shooter to stay away from the newspaper or its employees (which might have flagged him for a firearms prohibition).
But they had a swell "no firearms" policy on their property.