Welcome Guest

No, it's not collusion to a progressive magazine's eyes.

Posted on: June 14, 2018 at 10:21:20 CT
RHAYWORTH MU
Posts:
47420
Member For:
16.76 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
Lol. I used the nation, a progressive source.

The email?? No, it's not. Please, tell me the clintons didn't seek dirt on trump from all sources. You do realize they paid millions to setup the fake steele dossier?

Oh, but the sheer honesty of the clintons, no chance they'd collude is there? Can you, or anyone say that without laughing?

Gee, maybe that hillary collusion is in the 30K emails she illegally deleted?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Did Stephen Cohen write that? He's the publishers husband - Mo Texan MU - 6/14 10:17:55
          embarrassing(nm) - dangertim MU - 6/14 10:29:21
          Nice bullshyte distraction techinique. Aaron Mate did. - RHAYWORTH MU - 6/14 10:23:34
               So the answer is no? - Mo Texan MU - 6/14 13:06:42
          No, it's not collusion to a progressive magazine's eyes. - RHAYWORTH MU - 6/14 10:21:20
          If a foreign country has damaging information on a political - hokie VT - 6/14 10:19:47
     Give a Spec Prosecutor unlimited discretion - mu7176grad MU - 6/14 10:04:39
     I don't discount the possibility that some members of the - Spanky KU - 6/14 09:57:36




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard