 |
|
Marco rubio was asked this morning if firing mccabe under
Posted on: March 18, 2018 at 13:01:20 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68169
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
mines the FIB and our intelligence agencies. If constant attacks on the FIB and comey and mccabe damage our agencies (My words)
They must be pretty fragile.
The merciless and relentless attacks on trump never caused a sunday morning host to question whether those attacks damage the presidency or the nation. Those i suppose are cleansing. They reveal the dark and dirty secrets that only republicans have. The exposure is a disinfectant i guess.
But to suggest corruption at the FIB, why that is borderline treasonous. To suggest let alone presume that any executive in any intel agency is anything but a nonpartisan, america loving patriot is beyond the pale.
Exposing corruption at the FIB is dangerous to our nation.
Assuming and concocting corruption in the white house is patriotic. I guess.
Not sure which show i was listening to on the radio, but the host then read a tweet from the president. I forget the substance of it but the host then asked, and i will try to paraphrase as closely to the actual words as possible...
"Senator rubio, was there anything the president said in that tweet that you find factually correct?"
Imagine that being asked of an obama tweet. Did the president say ANYTHING at all in that tweet that was not a lie? (JG must have written that question for the host.)
Rubio, being a squishy GOPe tool did not take offense or admonish the host for suggesting that a four or five part tweet by the president of the united states was totally lies, he legitimized the question by offering some lame commentary on the substance of the tweet.
Rubio was asked to be on the talk show because the socialist media can count on him to be a squishy weakling and it provides the networks cover to say how bipartisan they are. After all they had marco rubio on, and he ran for president.
And rubio accepted because he is a squishy weakling who wants attention and to appear to be a peace maker and one who will work across the aisle to capitulate, i mean work with the other side.
I think the show was Press the Meat. Not sure.
THIS is why i am no longer a republican.
THIS is why i will no longer vote reflexively for the R.
And THIS is why rubio will never get my vote if he runs for president again.
Edited by hokie at 13:04:52 on 03/18/18
They must be pretty fragile.
The merciless and relentless attacks on trump never caused a sunday morning host to question whether those attacks damage the presidency or the nation. Those i suppose are cleansing. They reveal the dark and dirty secrets that only republicans have. The exposure is a disinfectant i guess.
But to suggest corruption at the FIB, why that is borderline treasonous. To suggest let alone presume that any executive in any intel agency is anything but a nonpartisan, america loving patriot is beyond the pale.
Exposing corruption at the FIB is dangerous to our nation.
Assuming and concocting corruption in the white house is patriotic. I guess.
Not sure which show i was listening to on the radio, but the host then read a tweet from the president. I forget the substance of it but the host then asked, and i will try to paraphrase as closely to the actual words as possible...
"Senator rubio, was there anything the president said in that tweet that you find factually correct?"
Imagine that being asked of an obama tweet. Did the president say ANYTHING at all in that tweet that was not a lie? (JG must have written that question for the host.)
Rubio, being a squishy GOPe tool did not take offense or admonish the host for suggesting that a four or five part tweet by the president of the united states was totally lies, he legitimized the question by offering some lame commentary on the substance of the tweet.
Rubio was asked to be on the talk show because the socialist media can count on him to be a squishy weakling and it provides the networks cover to say how bipartisan they are. After all they had marco rubio on, and he ran for president.
And rubio accepted because he is a squishy weakling who wants attention and to appear to be a peace maker and one who will work across the aisle to capitulate, i mean work with the other side.
I think the show was Press the Meat. Not sure.
THIS is why i am no longer a republican.
THIS is why i will no longer vote reflexively for the R.
And THIS is why rubio will never get my vote if he runs for president again.
Edited by hokie at 13:04:52 on 03/18/18
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Marco rubio was asked this morning if firing mccabe under - hokie VT - 3/18 13:01:20
-