Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: Solid investigation skills by Strzok

Posted on: March 6, 2018 at 09:54:02 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14278
Member For:
19.43 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
as I've mentioned before, I've investigated probably 100 cases or more working hand in hand with the FBI. they are absolutely nothing special. roughly equivalent to a big city cop with about 3 years on. meaning they don't know much (no offense Sal lol) the only thing they have going for them is resources and the weight of the fed gov't behind them. when I'd do interrogations with them they would sit there and let me do the entire thing b/c most of them have very little real-world interrogation experience. there were some that were good, but those were mostly guys who had been cops before joining the FBI. generally, you'd get individuals with law degrees who had never been attorneys and who had no law enforcement experience either. double whammy of crap.

Edited by blake1771 at 09:58:40 on 03/06/18
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Solid investigation skills by Strzok - Sal KC - 3/6 09:23:04
     RE: Solid investigation skills by Strzok - blake1771 KC - 3/6 09:54:02
     Anon sources - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 09:41:33
          Well, then by your standards it must be true. - Alferd Packer MU - 3/6 10:10:13
          Sal's anonymous sources are fine - MrBlueSky MU - 3/6 09:42:05
               Do you believe it was just incompetence - Sal KC - 3/6 09:44:49
                    Anon sources are valid now? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 09:47:00
                         Was Strzok incompetent? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 09:48:02
                              I wouldn't trust Fauxnews or Sun Yung Moon - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 10:45:36
                                   I'm asking you - Sal KC - 3/6 10:47:07
                                        I dont know. - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 10:48:15
                                             I'm not spinning anything - Sal KC - 3/6 11:03:00
                                                  You're deflecting from your use of anonymous sourced - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 11:04:53
                                                       I already conceded to throwing out the - Sal KC - 3/6 11:11:46
                                                            RE: I already conceded to throwing out the - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 11:12:39
               Trumpocrits - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 09:43:39
     Spending time on foxnews.com again I see (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 3/6 09:41:10
          That wasn't a Fox article (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 09:44:19
               This was originally from Fox. - MrBlueSky MU - 3/6 09:50:23
                    So a more accurate post would have been something - Sal KC - 3/6 09:51:25
                         You probably got it emailed to you to share - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 09:54:08
                              Was it a Fox article? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 09:55:54
                                   RE: Was it a Fox article? (nm) - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 10:42:41
                                        It's a pretty easy question to answer (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 10:46:48
                                             RE: It's a pretty easy question to answer (nm) - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 10:48:31
                                                  Yes or no - Sal KC - 3/6 10:54:19
                                                       You are trusting anon sources - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 11:05:53
                                                            yes or no? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 11:09:50
                                                                 You gotta be someone's mother in law - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 11:22:28
                                                                      yes or no? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 11:50:22
               It was based on a foxnews anon sourced article - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 09:47:42
                    Not a Fox News article (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 09:48:37
                         The articles source was a fox news article - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 09:53:42
                              If I was reading Fox I would have posted - Sal KC - 3/6 09:55:38
                                   Anon sources - JayHoaxH8r MU - 3/6 10:43:10
     Clinton huh? - raskolnikov MU - 3/6 09:25:23
          It's the same FBI and DOJ that created the dossier - 90Tiger MU - 3/6 09:53:45
               Dossier was a collection of documents brought to FBI - raskolnikov MU - 3/6 10:59:05
                    "brought to FBI by steele" - no, rask. Solicited by the DNC - 90Tiger MU - 3/6 11:38:16
          Horowitz is investigating it (nm) - Sal KC - 3/6 09:26:09
               Go to town - raskolnikov MU - 3/6 09:51:09
                    You don't know what the word - Sal KC - 3/6 09:52:06
                         You said Horowitz is investigating "it" - raskolnikov MU - 3/6 10:39:11




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard