Welcome Guest

No, Sessions never should have recused himself

Posted on: March 5, 2018 at 13:03:39 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

229171

Member For:

21.97 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

And just b/c Gowdy brings good points up in regards to what the SC could accomplish, I still believe a thorough investigation can be accomplished without one.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Gowdy on why a second special counsel is needed - Sal KC - 3/5 11:11:24

So investigations are good again - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 3/5 12:37:49

What are you talking about? (nm) - Sal KC - 3/5 12:40:45

Is the first special counsel needed, Sal? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 12:47:15

No, Sessions never should have recused himself - Sal KC - 3/5 13:03:39

Already there, but his scope is way to broad(nm) - tman KC - 3/5 12:51:38

That was JayHoax's point - MrBlueSky MU - 3/5 12:55:43

given everything that led to it being "needed" was based on - 90Tiger MU - 3/5 13:21:42

^^^^^Believes Richard E. Nixon wasn't a crook. - "Wild Bill" Donovan MU - 3/5 13:54:09

silly (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 3/5 14:02:24

Probably wasnt, given that is was based on false information - tman KC - 3/5 13:03:18

The narrative changes everyday - Silas MU - 3/5 11:16:26

That was in November - Sal KC - 3/5 11:19:27

And his position keeps changing - Silas MU - 3/5 11:22:46

Do you think that adjusting one's opinion in light of new - JeffB MU

- 3/5 11:26:34

No it doesn't - Sal KC - 3/5 11:25:13

Thanks for proving my point, Sal - Silas MU - 3/5 11:27:27